Thomas P. Brent
- Molecular Biology top 2%
- Cancer Research top 2%
- Genetics top 1%
- Oncology top 5%
- Genetics top 5%
- Co-authors
- Joanna S. RemackA.R. CrathornLinda C. HarrisPeter J. HoughtonJ. J. RobertsMathew A. von WronskiJ. A. V. ButlerB. Singer
- Topics
- DNA Repair Mechanisms (52 papers)Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (32 papers)DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry (21 papers)
- Journals
- NatureProceedings of the National Academy of SciencesJournal of the American Chemical Society
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Thomas P. Brent
87 papers receiving 3.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
- Molecular Biology 3.1k
- Cancer Research 1.0k
- Genetics 734
- Oncology 629
- Genetics 386
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas P. Brent
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas P. Brent's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas P. Brent with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas P. Brent more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas P. Brent
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas P. Brent. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas P. Brent. The network helps show where Thomas P. Brent may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas P. Brent
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas P. Brent. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas P. Brent based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas P. Brent. Thomas P. Brent is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 27 | |
| 2 | 17 | |
| 3 | Extraneuronal monoamine transporter expression and DNA repair vis-à-vis 2-chloroethyl-3-sarcosinamide-1-nitrosourea cytotoxicity in human tumor cell lines. | 10 |
| 4 | 68 | |
| 5 | 36 | |
| 6 | 10 | |
| 7 | 46 | |
| 8 | 37 | |
| 9 | 24 | |
| 10 | 52 | |
| 11 | 19 | |
| 12 | 8 | |
| 13 | 15 | |
| 14 | 100 | |
| 15 | 20 | |
| 16 | 8 | |
| 17 | 3 | |
| 18 | 7 | |
| 19 | 50 | |
| 20 | 19 |
About Thomas P. Brent
Thomas P. Brent is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Molecular Biology and Genetics, having authored 87 papers that have together received 3.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include DNA Repair Mechanisms (52 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (32 papers) and DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry (21 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Genetics (734 citations), Cancer Research (1.0k citations) and Molecular Biology (3.1k citations). Thomas P. Brent has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Joanna S. Remack, A.R. Crathorn, Linda C. Harris, Peter J. Houghton, J. J. Roberts, Mathew A. von Wronski, J. A. V. Butler, B. Singer, Rebecca P. Danam and Janet A. Houghton. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Journal of the American Chemical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.