Thomas Otto

143 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

Thomas Otto
Comparison fields: 5 of 125
  • Polymers and Plastics 359
  • Urology 118
  • Rheumatology 189
  • Biomedical Engineering 530
  • Surgery 487
Replace Manuel Monleón Pradas with:
Manuel Monleón Pradas Spain
Yang Ju Japan
Shu‐Wei Chang Taiwan
Yiqun Wu China
Xiao Guo China
Long Li China
Hao Meng China
Guive Balooch United States
Marie‐Christine Durrieu France
Ramin E. Beygui United States
Thomas Otto relative to Manuel Monleón Pradas Spain Manuel Monleón Pradas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Manuel Monleón Pradas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Otto

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Otto's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Otto with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Otto more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Otto

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Otto. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Otto. The network helps show where Thomas Otto may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Otto, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Otto Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Otto links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 151 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013320
2 2011118
3
Inverse relation of E-cadherin and autocrine motility factor receptor expression as a prognostic factor in patients with bladder carcinomas.
1994116
4 202192
5 199677
6 201468
7 201663
8
Systematic review and classification of complications after anterior, posterior, apical, and total vaginal mesh implantation for prolapse repair.
201457
9 200150
10 201337
11 200133
12 201232
13 202029
14 201328
15 199727
16 201327
17 202026
18 201426
19 201723
20 201522

About Thomas Otto

Thomas Otto is a scholar working on Urology, Bioengineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Biomedical Engineering and Rheumatology, having authored 151 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced MEMS and NEMS Technologies (24 papers), Acoustic Wave Resonator Technologies (13 papers), Pelvic floor disorders treatments (12 papers), Hernia repair and management (12 papers), Mechanical and Optical Resonators (11 papers), 3D IC and TSV technologies (10 papers), Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials (10 papers) and Photonic and Optical Devices (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Polymers and Plastics (359 citations), Urology (118 citations), Rheumatology (189 citations), Biomedical Engineering (530 citations) and Surgery (487 citations). Thomas Otto has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Hungary and United States. Frequent co-authors include Thomas Geßner, Holger Gerullis, Jinji Luo, Dimitri Barski, Detlef Billep, Marius Toader, Dietrich R. T. Zahn, Evgeniya Sheremet, Michael Hietschold and Thomas Waechtler. Their work appears in journals such as Microelectronic Engineering, BioMed Research International, International Journal of Surgery, Urology and Microsystem Technologies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026