Thomas N. Parks

4.2k total citations
60 papers, 3.5k citations indexed

About

Thomas N. Parks is a scholar working on Sensory Systems, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Nutrition and Dietetics. According to data from OpenAlex, Thomas N. Parks has authored 60 papers receiving a total of 3.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 32 papers in Sensory Systems, 25 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and 20 papers in Nutrition and Dietetics. Recurrent topics in Thomas N. Parks's work include Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (31 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (23 papers) and Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (20 papers). Thomas N. Parks is often cited by papers focused on Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (31 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (23 papers) and Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (20 papers). Thomas N. Parks collaborates with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Thomas N. Parks's co-authors include Edwin W. Rubel, Hunter Jackson, John W. Conlee, Gary Lynch, Carl W. Cotman, Sarah S. Mosko, Dee Ann Matthews, Ning Zhou, Edward F. Nemeth and Donnell J. Creel and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, Journal of Biological Chemistry and Journal of Neuroscience.

In The Last Decade

Thomas N. Parks

60 papers receiving 3.4k citations

Peers

Thomas N. Parks

CMN

Harunori Ohmori Japan

Kirsten K. Osen Norway

Eckhard Friauf Germany

Fernando Martínez‐Garciá Spain

P. Streit Switzerland

Albert S. Berrebi United States

Aldo Fasolo Italy

F. Valverde Spain

Michel Eybalin France

Marlies Knipper Germany

Harunori Ohmori Japan

Thomas N. Parks

2.6k ×1.6

CMN

2.0k ×1.4

2.3k ×2.2

1.1k ×1.3

421 ×0.9

Citations per year, relative to Thomas N. Parks Thomas N. Parks (= 1×) peers Harunori Ohmori

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas N. Parks

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas N. Parks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas N. Parks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas N. Parks more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas N. Parks

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas N. Parks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas N. Parks. The network helps show where Thomas N. Parks may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas N. Parks

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas N. Parks. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas N. Parks based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas N. Parks. Thomas N. Parks is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Ryugo, David K. & Thomas N. Parks. (2003). Primary innervation of the avian and mammalian cochlear nucleus. Brain Research Bulletin. 60(5-6). 435–456. 88 indexed citations

Sugden, Steven G., et al.. (2002). Development of the specialized AMPA receptors of auditory neurons. Journal of Neurobiology. 52(3). 189–202. 27 indexed citations

Zirpel, Lance & Thomas N. Parks. (2001). Zinc Inhibition of Group I mGluR-Mediated Calcium Homeostasis in Auditory Neurons. Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology. 2(2). 180–187. 38 indexed citations

Ravindranathan, Ajay, et al.. (2000). Contrasting molecular composition and channel properties of AMPA receptors on chick auditory and brainstem motor neurons. The Journal of Physiology. 523(3). 667–684. 54 indexed citations

Donevan, Sean D., et al.. (2000). Characterization of the AMPA‐Activated Receptors Present on Motoneurons. Journal of Neurochemistry. 74(1). 179–191. 67 indexed citations

Lee, Jae‐Hyung, et al.. (1998). Molecular analysis of AMPA-specific receptors: subunit composition, editing, and calcium influx determination in small amounts of tissue. Brain Research Protocols. 3(2). 142–154. 20 indexed citations

Ravindranathan, Ajay, Thomas N. Parks, & Mahendra S. Rao. (1997). New isoforms of the chick glutamate receptor subunit GluR4: molecular cloning, regional expression and developmental analysis. Molecular Brain Research. 50(1-2). 143–153. 18 indexed citations

Hughes, David I., et al.. (1996). Periodic blockade of AMPA/kainate receptors before the onset of synaptic transmission enhances neuronal survival in the chick brainstem auditory system. The Society for Neuroscience Abstracts. 22. 45. 2 indexed citations

Ravindranathan, Ajay, Thomas N. Parks, & Mahendra S. Rao. (1996). Flip and flop isoforms of chick brain AMPA receptor subunits. Neuroreport. 7(15). 2707–2712. 27 indexed citations

10.

Zhou, Ning, Dwan A. Taylor, & Thomas N. Parks. (1995). Cobalt-permeable non-NMDA receptors in developing chick brainstem auditory nuclei. Neuroreport. 6(17). 2273–2276. 45 indexed citations

11.

Zhou, Ning & Thomas N. Parks. (1993). Maintenance of pharmacologically-immature glutamate receptors by aberrant synapses in the chick cochlear nucleus. Brain Research. 628(1-2). 149–156. 13 indexed citations

12.

Haack, Julie A., Thomas N. Parks, & Martín Olivera. (1993). Conantokin-G antagonism of the NMDA receptor subtype expressed in cultured cerebellar granule cells. Neuroscience Letters. 163(1). 63–66. 18 indexed citations

13.

Parks, Thomas N. & Dwan A. Taylor. (1993). Altered distribution of synaptic densities at aberrant synapses in the chick cochlear nucleus. Neuroscience Letters. 150(1). 117–121. 3 indexed citations

14.

Zhou, Ning & Thomas N. Parks. (1992). γ-d-glutamylaminomethyl sulfonic acid (GAMS) distinguishes subtypes of glutamate receptor in the chick cochlear nucleus (nuc. magnocellularis). Hearing Research. 60(1). 20–26. 24 indexed citations

15.

Zhou, Ning & Thomas N. Parks. (1992). Developmental changes in the effects of drugs acting at NMDA or non-NMDA receptors on synaptic transmission in the chick cochlear nucleus (nuc. magnocellularis). Developmental Brain Research. 67(2). 145–152. 45 indexed citations

16.

Conlee, John W., et al.. (1991). Turn-specific and pigment-dependent differences in the stria vascularis of normal and gentamicin-treated albino and pigmented guinea pigs. Hearing Research. 55(1). 57–69. 20 indexed citations

17.

Jackson, Hunter & Thomas N. Parks. (1989). Spider Toxins: Recent Applications in Neurobiology. Annual Review of Neuroscience. 12(1). 405–414. 82 indexed citations

18.

Jackson, Hunter & Thomas N. Parks. (1988). Induction of aberrant functional afferents to the chick cochlear nucleus. The Journal of Comparative Neurology. 271(1). 106–114. 21 indexed citations

19.

Parks, Thomas N., Hunter Jackson, & John W. Conlee. (1987). Chapter 12 Axon-Target Cell Interactions in the Developing Auditory System. Current topics in developmental biology. 21. 309–340. 13 indexed citations

20.

Nemeth, Edward F., Hunter Jackson, & Thomas N. Parks. (1985). Evidence for the involvement of kainate receptors in synaptic transmission in the avian cochlear nucleus. Neuroscience Letters. 59(3). 297–301. 21 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact