Thomas N. Parks
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 1%
- Sensory Systems top 0.1%
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 2%
- Developmental Biology top 0.5%
- Co-authors
- Edwin W. RubelHunter JacksonJohn W. ConleeGary LynchCarl W. CotmanSarah S. MoskoDee Ann MatthewsNing Zhou
- Topics
- Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (31 papers)Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (23 papers)Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (20 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Thomas N. Parks
60 papers receiving 3.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 1.6k
- Sensory Systems 1.4k
- Molecular Biology 1.1k
- Cognitive Neuroscience 849
- Developmental Biology 461
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas N. Parks
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas N. Parks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas N. Parks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas N. Parks more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas N. Parks
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas N. Parks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas N. Parks. The network helps show where Thomas N. Parks may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas N. Parks
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas N. Parks. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas N. Parks based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas N. Parks. Thomas N. Parks is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 88 | |
| 2 | 27 | |
| 3 | 38 | |
| 4 | 54 | |
| 5 | 67 | |
| 6 | 20 | |
| 7 | 18 | |
| 8 | Periodic blockade of AMPA/kainate receptors before the onset of synaptic transmission enhances neuronal survival in the chick brainstem auditory system | 2 |
| 9 | 27 | |
| 10 | 45 | |
| 11 | 13 | |
| 12 | 18 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | 24 | |
| 15 | 45 | |
| 16 | 20 | |
| 17 | 82 | |
| 18 | 21 | |
| 19 | 13 | |
| 20 | 21 |
About Thomas N. Parks
Thomas N. Parks is a scholar working on Sensory Systems, Developmental Biology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 60 papers that have together received 3.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (31 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (23 papers) and Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (20 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (1.4k citations), Developmental Biology (461 citations) and Developmental Neuroscience (401 citations). Thomas N. Parks has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Edwin W. Rubel, Hunter Jackson, John W. Conlee, Gary Lynch, Carl W. Cotman, Sarah S. Mosko, Dee Ann Matthews, Ning Zhou, Edward F. Nemeth and Donnell J. Creel. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Journal of Biological Chemistry and Journal of Neuroscience.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.