Thomas Merriam

533 total citations
51 papers, 174 citations indexed

About

Thomas Merriam is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Classics and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Thomas Merriam has authored 51 papers receiving a total of 174 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in Artificial Intelligence, 7 papers in Classics and 5 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Thomas Merriam's work include Authorship Attribution and Profiling (19 papers), Medieval Literature and History (6 papers) and Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research (3 papers). Thomas Merriam is often cited by papers focused on Authorship Attribution and Profiling (19 papers), Medieval Literature and History (6 papers) and Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research (3 papers). Thomas Merriam collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom and France. Thomas Merriam's co-authors include Shaun Willimott and Simon D. Wagner and has published in prestigious journals such as Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, Literary and Linguistic Computing and Journal of Quantitative Linguistics.

In The Last Decade

Thomas Merriam

32 papers receiving 148 citations

Peers

Thomas Merriam

AI

SPS

LLT

IS

CLASS

Serge Lusignan Canada

Elena Pierazzo United Kingdom

Simon Hengchen Sweden

Marco Passarotti Italy

Joseph Rudman United States

Thomas Proisl Germany

Glenn Roe France

Ruth Ahnert United Kingdom

Mirko Tavoni Italy

Pau de Soto Spain

Serge Lusignan Canada

Thomas Merriam

87 ×0.7

AI

11 ×0.4

SPS

18 ×0.8

LLT

11 ×0.5

IS

23 ×1.5

CLASS

Citations per year, relative to Thomas Merriam Thomas Merriam (= 1×) peers Serge Lusignan

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Merriam

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Merriam's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Merriam with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Merriam more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Merriam

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Merriam. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Merriam. The network helps show where Thomas Merriam may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas Merriam

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas Merriam. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas Merriam based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas Merriam. Thomas Merriam is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

1.

Merriam, Thomas. (2023). Is it time to reconsider Henry V?. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities. 38(3). 1158–1165.

2.

Merriam, Thomas. (2018). A Contrast between Acts I and IV and Acts II and V in King John. Notes and Queries. 65(4). 524–530. 1 indexed citations

3.

Merriam, Thomas. (2017). Verse and Prose in Henry V. Notes and Queries. 64(2). 267–269. 2 indexed citations

4.

Willimott, Shaun, Thomas Merriam, & Simon D. Wagner. (2011). Apoptosis induces Bcl-XS and cleaved Bcl-XL in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 405(3). 480–485. 15 indexed citations

5.

Merriam, Thomas. (2009). A Question of Authenticity. Religion and the Arts. 13(1). 122–135. 1 indexed citations

6.

Merriam, Thomas. (2007). Co-authorship in King John. 1 indexed citations

7.

Merriam, Thomas. (2004). Defining Shake speare: ‘Pericles’ as Test Case. Notes and Queries. 51(3). 323–324. 3 indexed citations

8.

Merriam, Thomas. (2003). Shakespeare, Co‐Author: A Historical Study of Five Collaborative Plays. Notes and Queries. 50(3). 352–353. 10 indexed citations

9.

Merriam, Thomas. (2002). Faustian Joan. Notes and Queries. 49(2). 218–220.

10.

Merriam, Thomas. (2002). Intertextual Distances Between Shakespeare Plays, With Special Reference to Henry V (Verse). Journal of Quantitative Linguistics. 9(3). 261–273. 7 indexed citations

11.

Merriam, Thomas. (2001). FEMININE ENDINGS AND MORE. Notes and Queries. 48(3). 278–280. 1 indexed citations

12.

Merriam, Thomas. (2000). AN UNWARRANTED ASSUMPTION. Notes and Queries. 47(4). 438–441.

13.

Merriam, Thomas. (2000). The misunderstanding of Munday as author of Sir Thomas More. The Review of English Studies. 51(204). 540–581. 4 indexed citations

14.

Merriam, Thomas. (1998). THE TENOR OF MARLOWE IN HENRY V. Notes and Queries. 45(3). 318–324. 1 indexed citations

15.

Merriam, Thomas. (1998). Heterogeneous authorship in early Shakespeare and the problem of Henry V. Literary and Linguistic Computing. 13(1). 15–28. 16 indexed citations

16.

Merriam, Thomas. (1998). INFLUENCE ALONE? MORE ON THE AUTHORSHIP OF TITUS ANDRONICUS. Notes and Queries. 45(3). 304–308. 2 indexed citations

17.

Merriam, Thomas. (1996). GROATSWORTH'S ADDED VALUE. Notes and Queries. 43(2). 145–149.

18.

Merriam, Thomas. (1994). LETTER FREQUENCY AS A DISCRIMINATOR OF AUTHORS. Notes and Queries. 41(4). 467–469. 3 indexed citations

19.

Merriam, Thomas. (1990). DID MUNDAY COMPOSE SIR THOMAS MORE?. Notes and Queries. 37(2). 175–178.

20.

Merriam, Thomas. (1988). WAS HAND B IN SIR THOMAS MORE HEYWOOD'S AUTOGRAPH?. Notes and Queries. 35(4). 455–458. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact