Countries citing papers authored by Marco Passarotti
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Marco Passarotti's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Marco Passarotti with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Marco Passarotti more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Marco Passarotti
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Marco Passarotti. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Marco Passarotti. The network helps show where Marco Passarotti may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Marco Passarotti
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Marco Passarotti.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Marco Passarotti based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Marco Passarotti. Marco Passarotti is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Passarotti, Marco, et al.. (2019). The LiLa Knowledge Base of Linguistic Resources and NLP Tools for Latin. 6–11.4 indexed citations
10.
Passarotti, Marco. (2016). How Far Is Stanford from Prague (and vice versa)? Comparing Two Dependency-based Annotation Schemes by Network Analysis. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.2 indexed citations
11.
Ponti, Edoardo Maria & Marco Passarotti. (2016). "Differentia compositionem facit": a slower-paced and reliable parser for Latin. Language Resources and Evaluation. 683–688.5 indexed citations
12.
Passarotti, Marco, et al.. (2016). Latin Vallex. A Treebank-based Semantic Valency Lexicon for Latin. Language Resources and Evaluation. 2599–2606.2 indexed citations
13.
Martens, Scott N. & Marco Passarotti. (2014). Thomas Aquinas in the T"uNDRA: Integrating the Index Thomisticus Treebank into CLARIN-D. Language Resources and Evaluation. 767–774.1 indexed citations
14.
Reynaert, Martin, et al.. (2012). Historical spelling normalization. A comparison of two statistical methods:TICCL and VARD2. Tilburg University Research Portal.6 indexed citations
Passarotti, Marco & Felice Dell’Orletta⋄. (2010). Improvements in Parsing the Index Thomisticus Treebank. Revision, Combination and a Feature Model for Medieval Latin. Language Resources and Evaluation. 1964–1971.8 indexed citations
17.
Passarotti, Marco, et al.. (2010). Parsing the Index Thomisticus Treebank. Some Preliminary Results. Ochsner Journal. 15(4). 714–725.6 indexed citations
18.
McGillivray, Barbara, et al.. (2009). The Index Thomisticus Treebank Project: Annotation, Parsing and Valency Lexicon. 50(2). 103–127.9 indexed citations
19.
McGillivray, Barbara & Marco Passarotti. (2009). The Development of the ``Index Thomisticus'' Treebank Valency Lexicon. Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 43–50.12 indexed citations
20.
Bamman, David, et al.. (2008). The annotation guidelines of the Latin Dependency Treebank and Index Thomisticus Treebank. The treatment of some specific syntactic constructions in Latin. Language Resources and Evaluation. 71–76.14 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.