Thomas M. Twomey

25 total papers · 907 total citations
20 papers, 730 citations indexed

About

Thomas M. Twomey is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Analytical Chemistry and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Thomas M. Twomey has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 730 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Pharmacology, 6 papers in Analytical Chemistry and 5 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in Thomas M. Twomey's work include Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (7 papers), Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals (6 papers) and Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (4 papers). Thomas M. Twomey is often cited by papers focused on Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (7 papers), Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals (6 papers) and Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (4 papers). Thomas M. Twomey collaborates with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Thomas M. Twomey's co-authors include Donald C. Hobbs, M. Schach von Wittenau, James A. Taylor, Simonetta Bartolucci, George M. Milne, Erin Stevens, D. Nicholas Bateman, M. D. Rawlins, Roger F. Palmer and W. Gordon Walker and has published in prestigious journals such as Kidney International, Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics.

In The Last Decade

Thomas M. Twomey

20 papers receiving 621 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Thomas M. Twomey 269 182 178 146 73 20 730
Donald C. Hobbs 223 0.8× 161 0.9× 179 1.0× 135 0.9× 35 0.5× 29 686
M. Mitchard 287 1.1× 142 0.8× 149 0.8× 150 1.0× 93 1.3× 57 884
Vanessa L. Herring 327 1.2× 193 1.1× 95 0.5× 177 1.2× 103 1.4× 20 907
Anthony S. Ridolfo 259 1.0× 82 0.5× 83 0.5× 188 1.3× 69 0.9× 31 687
Edward J. Mroszczak 360 1.3× 118 0.6× 67 0.4× 136 0.9× 101 1.4× 26 794
Renpei Nagashima 135 0.5× 204 1.1× 101 0.6× 203 1.4× 79 1.1× 15 720
Hideyo Noguchi 165 0.6× 191 1.0× 102 0.6× 128 0.9× 88 1.2× 56 779
Tamehiro Tsuchiya 168 0.6× 100 0.5× 103 0.6× 217 1.5× 61 0.8× 19 641
Richard Runkel 346 1.3× 79 0.4× 117 0.7× 176 1.2× 72 1.0× 16 626
Richard H. Reuning 133 0.5× 146 0.8× 143 0.8× 107 0.7× 136 1.9× 45 809

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas M. Twomey

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas M. Twomey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas M. Twomey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas M. Twomey more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas M. Twomey

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas M. Twomey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas M. Twomey. The network helps show where Thomas M. Twomey may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas M. Twomey

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas M. Twomey. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas M. Twomey based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas M. Twomey. Thomas M. Twomey is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026