Thomas M. Maddox
- Family Practice top 0.2%
-
- Acute Myocardial Infarction Research 34
- Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes 28
- Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors 14
- Heart Failure Treatment and Management 12
- Geriatrics and Gerontology top 1%
-
- Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics 25
- Health Informatics top 2%
-
- Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics 19
-
- Aortic aneurysm repair treatments 10
-
- Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life 10
- Co-authors
- John S. RumsfeldP. Michael HoDavid J. MagidStephan D. FihnFrederick A. MasoudiKaren E. JoyntJohn A. SpertusPamela N. Peterson
- Journals
- JAMA (2 papers)Circulation (5 papers)Journal of the American College of Cardiology (13 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomAustralia
In The Last Decade
Thomas M. Maddox
104 papers receiving 5.0k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 138
- Family Practice 494
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 3.2k
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 275
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 1.5k
- Health Informatics 58
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas M. Maddox
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas M. Maddox's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas M. Maddox with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas M. Maddox more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas M. Maddox
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas M. Maddox. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas M. Maddox. The network helps show where Thomas M. Maddox may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas M. Maddox, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2021 | 35 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 15 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 81 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 3 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 6 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 5 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 55 | |
| 8 | 2018 | 6 | |
| 9 | 2017 | 72 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 239 | |
| 11 | 2016 | 7 | |
| 12 | 2015 | 50 | |
| 13 | 2015 | 7 | |
| 14 | 2014 | 23 | |
| 15 | 2013 | 14 | |
| 16 | 2013 | 2 | |
| 17 | 2013 | 95 | |
| 18 | 2010 | 76 | |
| 19 | 2009 | 22 | |
| 20 | 2005 | 114 |
About Thomas M. Maddox
Thomas M. Maddox is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Family Practice and Geriatrics and Gerontology, having authored 105 papers that have together received 5.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Acute Myocardial Infarction Research (34 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (28 papers), Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (25 papers), Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics (19 papers), Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (14 papers), Heart Failure Treatment and Management (12 papers), Aortic aneurysm repair treatments (10 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (494 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (3.2k citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (275 citations). Thomas M. Maddox has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include John S. Rumsfeld, P. Michael Ho, David J. Magid, Stephan D. Fihn, Frederick A. Masoudi, Karen E. Joynt, John A. Spertus, Pamela N. Peterson, Peter K. Smith and Thomas T. Tsai. Their work appears in journals such as JAMA, Circulation and Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.