Thomas M. Leschine

959 total citations
45 papers, 695 citations indexed

About

Thomas M. Leschine is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law and Pollution. According to data from OpenAlex, Thomas M. Leschine has authored 45 papers receiving a total of 695 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 21 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 12 papers in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law and 10 papers in Pollution. Recurrent topics in Thomas M. Leschine's work include Risk Perception and Management (17 papers), Oil Spill Detection and Mitigation (10 papers) and Coastal and Marine Management (7 papers). Thomas M. Leschine is often cited by papers focused on Risk Perception and Management (17 papers), Oil Spill Detection and Mitigation (10 papers) and Coastal and Marine Management (7 papers). Thomas M. Leschine collaborates with scholars based in United States, South Korea and Slovakia. Thomas M. Leschine's co-authors include Kate Starbird, Ann Bostrom, Ann Hayward Walker, Hannele Wallenius, William A. Verdini, Thomas R. Stewart, Christina H. Drew, Timothy Nyerges, Jungho Nam and Karen Dyson and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, European Journal of Operational Research and Journal of Environmental Management.

In The Last Decade

Thomas M. Leschine

45 papers receiving 633 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Thomas M. Leschine United States 16 214 115 113 108 88 45 695
E. Rovenskaya Austria 15 138 0.6× 213 1.9× 53 0.5× 163 1.5× 108 1.2× 81 953
P Hjorth Sweden 13 115 0.5× 286 2.5× 40 0.4× 145 1.3× 59 0.7× 21 1.3k
Thomas A. Grigalunas United States 16 53 0.2× 179 1.6× 167 1.5× 163 1.5× 76 0.9× 45 922
Yang-Chi Chang Taiwan 14 94 0.4× 174 1.5× 41 0.4× 137 1.3× 136 1.5× 38 722
Paul Craig United Kingdom 20 229 1.1× 140 1.2× 38 0.3× 82 0.8× 25 0.3× 132 1.6k
Sally J. Goerner United States 9 90 0.4× 207 1.8× 56 0.5× 79 0.7× 86 1.0× 24 758
Bernard Liétaer United States 13 135 0.6× 193 1.7× 48 0.4× 70 0.6× 85 1.0× 26 892
Kedong Yin China 21 99 0.5× 138 1.2× 57 0.5× 115 1.1× 40 0.5× 84 1.2k
Gerhard Fuchs Germany 15 326 1.5× 391 3.4× 39 0.3× 51 0.5× 21 0.2× 56 1.2k
Lisa Pizzol Italy 22 371 1.7× 181 1.6× 22 0.2× 191 1.8× 81 0.9× 53 1.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas M. Leschine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas M. Leschine's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas M. Leschine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas M. Leschine more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas M. Leschine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas M. Leschine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas M. Leschine. The network helps show where Thomas M. Leschine may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas M. Leschine

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas M. Leschine. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas M. Leschine based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas M. Leschine. Thomas M. Leschine is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Leschine, Thomas M., et al.. (2016). An evaluation of oil pollution prevention strategies in the Arctic: A comparison of Canadian and U.S. approaches. Marine Policy. 72. 255–262. 5 indexed citations
2.
Bostrom, Ann, et al.. (2014). Methods for Communicating the Complexity and Uncertainty of Oil Spill Response Actions and Tradeoffs. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment An International Journal. 21(3). 631–645. 15 indexed citations
3.
Bostrom, Ann, et al.. (2014). Oil Spill Response Risk Judgments, Decisions, and Mental Models: Findings from Surveying U.S. Stakeholders and Coastal Residents. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment An International Journal. 21(3). 581–604. 15 indexed citations
4.
Trainer, Vera L., et al.. (2011). Cooperation of Science and Management for Harmful Algal Blooms: Domoic Acid and the Washington Coast Razor Clam Fishery. Coastal Management. 40(1). 33–54. 16 indexed citations
5.
Ryu, Jongseong, Thomas M. Leschine, Jungho Nam, Won Keun Chang, & Karen Dyson. (2010). A resilience-based approach for comparing expert preferences across two large-scale coastal management programs. Journal of Environmental Management. 92(1). 92–101. 31 indexed citations
6.
Rosa, Eugene A., Seth Tuler, Baruch Fischhoff, et al.. (2010). Nuclear Waste: Progress with Public Engagement—Response. Science. 330(6003). 448–449. 3 indexed citations
7.
Leschine, Thomas M., et al.. (2006). An Evaluation of the Influence of Natural Science in Regional-Scale Restoration Projects. Environmental Management. 37(3). 367–379. 15 indexed citations
8.
Leschine, Thomas M.. (2006). Long-Term Management of Contaminated Sites. 4 indexed citations
9.
Wissmar, Robert C., et al.. (2004). A Screening Procedure for Prioritizing Riparian Management. Environmental Management. 33(1). 151–161. 11 indexed citations
10.
Drew, Christina H., Timothy Nyerges, & Thomas M. Leschine. (2004). Promoting Transparency of Long‐Term Environmental Decisions: The Hanford Decision Mapping System Pilot Project. Risk Analysis. 24(6). 1641–1664. 21 indexed citations
11.
Burger, Joanna, Thomas M. Leschine, Michael Greenberg, et al.. (2003). Shifting Priorities at the Department of Energy's Bomb Factories: Protecting Human and Ecological Health. Environmental Management. 31(2). 157–167. 33 indexed citations
12.
Abbotts, John, et al.. (2003). Building leasing at the department of energy's Hanford site: Lessons learned from commercial reuse. 14(1). 95–107. 11 indexed citations
13.
Ferriss, Bridget E. & Thomas M. Leschine. (2003). Assessing coastal practitioners' views on environmental indicators: Case studies in U.S. Pacific Northwest estuaries. Aquatic Ecosystem Health & Management. 6(2). 139–146. 1 indexed citations
14.
Leschine, Thomas M., et al.. (2002). A Procedural Evaluation of an Analytic‐Deliberative Process: The Columbia River Comprehensive Impact Assessment. Risk Analysis. 22(1). 83–100. 13 indexed citations
15.
Leschine, Thomas M.. (2002). Oil Spills and the Social Amplification and Attenuation of Risk. Spill Science & Technology Bulletin. 7(1-2). 63–73. 22 indexed citations
16.
Goldstein, Bernard D., Serap Erdal, Joanna Burger, et al.. (2000). Stakeholder participation: Experience from the CRESP program. 2. 103–111. 15 indexed citations
17.
Leschine, Thomas M., John R. Clark, Kem Lowry, S. L. Olsen, & Jens Chr. Sørensen. (1997). Notes and Comments. Coastal Management. 25(3). 345–357. 1 indexed citations
18.
Leschine, Thomas M., et al.. (1990). Container terminal productivity: a perspective. Maritime Policy & Management. 17(2). 107–112. 104 indexed citations
19.
Rubin, Jonathan, et al.. (1989). A PROPOSED RESOURCE DAMAGE ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY FOR WASHINGTON STATE1. International Oil Spill Conference Proceedings. 1989(1). 275–279. 1 indexed citations
20.
Stewart, Thomas R. & Thomas M. Leschine. (1986). Judgment and Analysis in Oil Spill Risk Assessment. Risk Analysis. 6(3). 305–315. 22 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026