Kate Starbird

7.9k total citations · 4 hit papers
91 papers, 4.9k citations indexed

About

Kate Starbird is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Communication and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics. According to data from OpenAlex, Kate Starbird has authored 91 papers receiving a total of 4.9k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 64 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 56 papers in Communication and 23 papers in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics. Recurrent topics in Kate Starbird's work include Misinformation and Its Impacts (42 papers), Social Media and Politics (35 papers) and Public Relations and Crisis Communication (27 papers). Kate Starbird is often cited by papers focused on Misinformation and Its Impacts (42 papers), Social Media and Politics (35 papers) and Public Relations and Crisis Communication (27 papers). Kate Starbird collaborates with scholars based in United States and Switzerland. Kate Starbird's co-authors include Leysia Palen, Sarah Vieweg, Amanda Hughes, Ahmer Arif, Tom Wilson, Emma S. Spiro, Mania Orand, Dharma Dailey, Robert M. Mason and Leo G Stewart and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Science Advances.

In The Last Decade

Kate Starbird

87 papers receiving 4.6k citations

Hit Papers

Microblogging during two natural hazards events 2010 2026 2015 2020 2010 2011 2014 2019 250 500 750 1000

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Kate Starbird United States 33 3.3k 2.8k 1.1k 1.1k 713 91 4.9k
Sarah Vieweg United States 24 2.4k 0.7× 2.8k 1.0× 1.2k 1.1× 917 0.8× 507 0.7× 40 4.3k
Amanda Hughes United States 24 2.5k 0.8× 2.6k 0.9× 640 0.6× 801 0.7× 426 0.6× 59 4.3k
Leysia Palen United States 53 5.6k 1.7× 4.8k 1.7× 1.4k 1.2× 1.4k 1.3× 1.3k 1.8× 102 9.7k
Christian Reuter Germany 28 1.5k 0.4× 1.2k 0.4× 595 0.5× 154 0.1× 469 0.7× 231 3.2k
Patric R. Spence United States 35 2.9k 0.9× 2.3k 0.8× 800 0.7× 223 0.2× 248 0.3× 135 4.7k
Bárbara Poblete Chile 16 2.1k 0.6× 845 0.3× 1.5k 1.3× 1.1k 1.0× 1.3k 1.8× 63 3.3k
Manuel Cebrián United States 31 1.1k 0.3× 489 0.2× 584 0.5× 711 0.7× 309 0.4× 105 3.8k
Jeannette Sutton United States 31 2.1k 0.6× 1.6k 0.6× 294 0.3× 224 0.2× 180 0.3× 78 3.0k
Marcelo Mendoza Chile 16 2.1k 0.6× 742 0.3× 1.4k 1.2× 1.0k 0.9× 1.3k 1.8× 82 3.4k
Winter Mason United States 18 1.5k 0.5× 881 0.3× 715 0.6× 1.5k 1.4× 515 0.7× 35 4.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Kate Starbird

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kate Starbird's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kate Starbird with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kate Starbird more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kate Starbird

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kate Starbird. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kate Starbird. The network helps show where Kate Starbird may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kate Starbird

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kate Starbird. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kate Starbird based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kate Starbird. Kate Starbird is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Backer, Lorraine C., et al.. (2025). How Strategic Information Operations Affect Peacekeeping: Two Case Studies from the Central African Republic. International Peacekeeping. 32(3). 414–456.
2.
Starbird, Kate, et al.. (2025). Deep Storytelling: Collective Sensemaking and Layers of Meaning in U.S. Elections. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction. 9(7). 1–43. 1 indexed citations
3.
Starbird, Kate, et al.. (2024). Governance Capture in a Self-Governing Community: A Qualitative Comparison of the Croatian, Serbian, Bosnian, and Serbo-Croatian Wikipedias. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction. 8(CSCW1). 1–26. 3 indexed citations
4.
Starbird, Kate, et al.. (2023). Participatory Design and Power in Misinformation, Disinformation, and Online Hate Research. 1724–1739. 4 indexed citations
5.
Beers, Andrew, et al.. (2023). Selective and deceptive citation in the construction of dueling consensuses. Science Advances. 9(38). eadh1933–eadh1933. 3 indexed citations
6.
Davidson, Rachel A., et al.. (2023). Typology of household adaptations to infrastructure system service interruptions. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. 97. 103974–103974. 4 indexed citations
7.
Beers, Andrew, et al.. (2023). Followback Clusters, Satellite Audiences, and Bridge Nodes: Coengagement Networks for the 2020 US Election. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media. 17. 59–71. 4 indexed citations
8.
Starbird, Kate, et al.. (2023). Post-Spotlight Posts: The Impact of Sudden Social Media Attention on Account Behavior. 273–277. 1 indexed citations
9.
Bak-Coleman, Joseph B., Ian Kennedy, Andrew Beers, et al.. (2022). Combining interventions to reduce the spread of viral misinformation. Nature Human Behaviour. 6(10). 1372–1380. 78 indexed citations
10.
Starbird, Kate, et al.. (2022). Bridging Contextual and Methodological Gaps on the “Misinformation Beat”: Insights from Journalist-Researcher Collaborations at Speed. CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–15. 8 indexed citations
11.
Starbird, Kate & Jeannie A. Stamberger. (2018). Tweak the Tweet: Leveraging Microblogging Proliferation with a Prescriptive Syntax to Support Citizen Reporting. Figshare. 16 indexed citations
12.
Wilson, T. D., et al.. (2017). Language Limitations in Rumor Research? Comparing French and English Tweets Sent During the 2015 Paris Attacks.. ISCRAM. 7 indexed citations
13.
Stewart, Leo G, et al.. (2017). Alternative Narratives of Crisis Events. 263–266. 21 indexed citations
14.
Robinson, John J., et al.. (2016). Eyes on the Ground: Emerging Practices in Periscope Use during Crisis Events.. ISCRAM. 13 indexed citations
15.
Zeng, Li, Kate Starbird, & Emma S. Spiro. (2016). Rumors at the Speed of Light? Modeling the Rate of Rumor Transmission During Crisis. 1969–1978. 35 indexed citations
16.
Robinson, John J., et al.. (2015). Examining the role of human and technical infrastructure during emergency response. International Conference on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management. 1 indexed citations
17.
Dailey, Dharma & Kate Starbird. (2014). Visible skepticism: Community vetting after Hurricane Irene.. ISCRAM. 11 indexed citations
18.
Starbird, Kate. (2013). Delivering patients to sacré coeur. 801–810. 37 indexed citations
19.
Starbird, Kate, et al.. (2012). Learning from the crowd: Collaborative filtering techniques for identifying on-the-ground Twitterers during mass disruptions.. ISCRAM. 70 indexed citations
20.
Starbird, Kate & Leysia Palen. (2010). Pass It On?: Retweeting in Mass Emergency. ISCRAM. 182 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026