Thomas M. Larkin
- Pharmacology top 2%
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 2%
- Surgery top 10%
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine top 2%
- Physiology
- Co-authors
- Steven P. CohenScott GriffithKayode WilliamsConnie KuriharaAudrey S. ChangRobert W. HurleyMilan P. StojanovicAnthony Sireci
- Topics
- Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (16 papers)Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (12 papers)Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanyUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Thomas M. Larkin
22 papers receiving 730 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
- Pharmacology 536
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 526
- Surgery 364
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 184
- Physiology 125
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas M. Larkin
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas M. Larkin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas M. Larkin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas M. Larkin more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas M. Larkin
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas M. Larkin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas M. Larkin. The network helps show where Thomas M. Larkin may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas M. Larkin
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas M. Larkin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas M. Larkin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas M. Larkin. Thomas M. Larkin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 55 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 35 | |
| 5 | 45 | |
| 6 | 15 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | Pulsed radiofrequency of the dorsal root ganglia is superior to pharmacotherapy or pulsed radiofrequency of the intercostal nerves in the treatment of chronic postsurgical thoracic pain. | 99 |
| 9 | 44 | |
| 10 | 66 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 23 | |
| 14 | 25 | |
| 15 | 69 | |
| 16 | 16 | |
| 17 | 16 | |
| 18 | 25 | |
| 19 | 12 | |
| 20 | An Evaluation of Caching Strategies for Clustered Web Servers | 0 |
About Thomas M. Larkin
Thomas M. Larkin is a scholar working on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Pharmacology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 24 papers that have together received 787 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (16 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (12 papers) and Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (184 citations), Pharmacology (536 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (526 citations). Thomas M. Larkin has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Steven P. Cohen, Scott Griffith, Kayode Williams, Connie Kurihara, Audrey S. Chang, Robert W. Hurley, Milan P. Stojanovic, Anthony Sireci, Matthew Crooks and Christopher L. Wu. Their work appears in journals such as Spine, Anesthesiology and Anesthesia & Analgesia.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.