Thomas M. Krummel
- Surgery top 1%
- Biomedical Engineering top 5%
- Rehabilitation top 0.2%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 5%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 5%
- Co-authors
- David B. CamarilloI. Kelman CohenJ. Kenneth SalisburyPaul J. GormanMichael T. LongakerArnold M. SalzbergRobert F. DiegelmannChantal L. Rawn
- Topics
- Wound Healing and Treatments (30 papers)Surgical Simulation and Training (21 papers)Anatomy and Medical Technology (16 papers)
- Cited by
- RehabilitationSurgeryUrology
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Thomas M. Krummel
128 papers receiving 4.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 168
- Surgery 2.2k
- Biomedical Engineering 975
- Rehabilitation 886
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 786
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 523
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas M. Krummel
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas M. Krummel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas M. Krummel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas M. Krummel more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas M. Krummel
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas M. Krummel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas M. Krummel. The network helps show where Thomas M. Krummel may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas M. Krummel
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas M. Krummel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas M. Krummel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas M. Krummel. Thomas M. Krummel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | Special perspectives in infants and children | 0 |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 21 | |
| 7 | 30 | |
| 8 | 35 | |
| 9 | 152 | |
| 10 | 13 | |
| 11 | 30 | |
| 12 | 12 | |
| 13 | 12 | |
| 14 | Infections and immunologic disorders in pediatric surgery | 5 |
| 15 | 54 | |
| 16 | Characteristics of fetal repair. | 7 |
| 17 | 11 | |
| 18 | 6 | |
| 19 | 176 | |
| 20 | 65 |
About Thomas M. Krummel
Thomas M. Krummel is a scholar working on Rehabilitation, Surgery and Urology, having authored 130 papers that have together received 4.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Wound Healing and Treatments (30 papers), Surgical Simulation and Training (21 papers) and Anatomy and Medical Technology (16 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (886 citations), Surgery (2.2k citations) and Urology (256 citations). Thomas M. Krummel has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include David B. Camarillo, I. Kelman Cohen, J. Kenneth Salisbury, Paul J. Gorman, Michael T. Longaker, Arnold M. Salzberg, Robert F. Diegelmann, Chantal L. Rawn, Randy S. Haluck and Andreas H. Meier. Their work appears in journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, PLoS ONE and PEDIATRICS.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.