Thomas M. Kerr

14 total papers · 486 total citations
10 papers, 343 citations indexed

About

Thomas M. Kerr is a scholar working on Surgery, Internal Medicine and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. According to data from OpenAlex, Thomas M. Kerr has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 343 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Surgery, 5 papers in Internal Medicine and 3 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. Recurrent topics in Thomas M. Kerr's work include Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (5 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (3 papers) and Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (3 papers). Thomas M. Kerr is often cited by papers focused on Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (5 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (3 papers) and Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (3 papers). Thomas M. Kerr collaborates with scholars based in United States. Thomas M. Kerr's co-authors include John J. Cranley, Kenneth S. Lutter, Michael Sampson, L. Richard Roedersheimer, Joann M. Lohr, Joanne M. Lohr, Peter J. McKenna, Jennifer Johnson, Kimberly A. Hasselfeld and Jennifer L. Winkler and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Vascular Surgery, The American Journal of Surgery and Annals of Vascular Surgery.

In The Last Decade

Thomas M. Kerr

10 papers receiving 315 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author						Papers	Cites
Thomas M. Kerr	295	222	134	112	50	10	343
Kenneth S. Lutter	322 1.1×	239 1.1×	145 1.1×	116 1.0×	44 0.9×	9	361
René Jensen	243 0.8×	202 0.9×	50 0.4×	151 1.3×	74 1.5×	12	367
H M Christiansen	309 1.0×	173 0.8×	58 0.4×	194 1.7×	40 0.8×	12	373
Michael L. Thomas	341 1.2×	286 1.3×	151 1.1×	84 0.8×	41 0.8×	6	390
Patrick DePippo	204 0.7×	136 0.6×	99 0.7×	131 1.2×	109 2.2×	11	302
David J. Peter	190 0.6×	238 1.1×	72 0.5×	61 0.5×	68 1.4×	9	327
Amy Caton	206 0.7×	150 0.7×	115 0.9×	111 1.0×	44 0.9×	9	320
Magali Epinat	354 1.2×	177 0.8×	102 0.8×	203 1.8×	34 0.7×	14	400
Gail P. Size	241 0.8×	192 0.9×	65 0.5×	117 1.0×	72 1.4×	7	312
J. Fernández Llamazares	226 0.8×	206 0.9×	144 1.1×	97 0.9×	61 1.2×	17	373

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas M. Kerr

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas M. Kerr's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas M. Kerr with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas M. Kerr more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas M. Kerr

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas M. Kerr. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas M. Kerr. The network helps show where Thomas M. Kerr may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas M. Kerr

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas M. Kerr. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas M. Kerr based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas M. Kerr. Thomas M. Kerr is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact