Thomas M. Alloway

1.4k citations
37 papers · 1.0k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas M. Alloway

36 papers receiving 946 citations

Peers

Thomas M. Alloway
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 671
  • Genetics 663
  • Insect Science 275
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 132
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 88
Replace T. C. Schneirla with:
T. C. Schneirla United States
Karen L. Hollis United States
Aung Si Australia
P. A. Couvillon United States
Pierre Jaisson France
Stanley C. Ratner United States
Sarah A. Collins United Kingdom
Raymond Campan France
Catherine Plowright Canada
Margaret Bastock United Kingdom
Thomas M. Alloway relative to T. C. Schneirla United States T. C. Schneirla's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
T. C. Schneirla · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas M. Alloway

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas M. Alloway's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas M. Alloway with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas M. Alloway more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas M. Alloway

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas M. Alloway. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas M. Alloway. The network helps show where Thomas M. Alloway may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Thomas M. Alloway, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas M. Alloway Line = papers co-authored together Thomas M. Alloway links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Communication and Affect: Language and Thought
1973182
2 1982106
3 197996
4 198074
5 197272
6 197554
7 197842
8 198235
9 198335
10 199333
11 197232
12 199028
13 200126
14 197722
15 198522
16 196721
17 198719
18 198318
19 198316
20 196913

About Thomas M. Alloway

Thomas M. Alloway is a scholar working on Genetics, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Plant Science, having authored 37 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (25 papers), Plant and animal studies (22 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (9 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (9 papers), Insect Utilization and Effects (5 papers), Fossil Insects in Amber (5 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (2 papers) and Insect Pest Control Strategies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (671 citations), Genetics (663 citations), Insect Science (275 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (132 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (88 citations). Thomas M. Alloway has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Robin J. Stuart, Lester Krames, Patricia Pliner, Alfred Buschinger, Fergus I. M. Craik, James F. Hare, Cynthia Thomas, Mary Talbot, Aryeh Routtenberg and Jürgen Heınze. Their work appears in journals such as Animal Behaviour, Science, Behaviour, Insectes Sociaux and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact