Thomas Little

436 citations
19 papers · 330 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Little

19 papers receiving 308 citations

Peers

Thomas Little
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 138
  • Internal Medicine 19
  • Surgery 174
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 49
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 61
Replace Chava Chezar‐Azerrad with:
Chava Chezar‐Azerrad United States
Abhishek Maan United States
Alen Ružić Croatia
Elżbieta Poniewierka Poland
Nabil Mohsen Egypt
José Luis Winter Chile
João Pedro Lopes Portugal
Amudha Kumar United States
Alois Suessenbacher Austria
Ayman Battisha United States
Thomas Little relative to Chava Chezar‐Azerrad United States Chava Chezar‐Azerrad's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.2×
Chava Chezar‐Azerrad · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Little

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Little's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Little with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Little more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Little

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Little. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Little. The network helps show where Thomas Little may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Little, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Little Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Little links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 198999
2 199450
3 199342
4 200432
5
Parasite transgenerational effects on infection
200720
6 199814
7 198311
8 19919
9 19898
10 19908
11 19907
12 19897
13 19897
14 19934
15 19884
16 19923
17 19902
18
Parasitism and environmental sex determination in Daphnia.
20092
19 19911

About Thomas Little

Thomas Little is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 19 papers that have together received 330 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics (7 papers), Acute Myocardial Infarction Research (6 papers), Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (6 papers), Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (3 papers), Vascular Procedures and Complications (2 papers), Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments (2 papers), Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management (2 papers) and Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (138 citations), Internal Medicine (19 citations), Surgery (174 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (49 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (61 citations). Thomas Little has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Augusto D. Pichard, Mark R. Milner, Joseph Lindsay, Joel Rosenberg, Ellen Pinnow, Kenneth R. Lee, Joseph Lindsay, Khalid Karim, Michelle Tseng and Pedro F. Vale. Their work appears in journals such as The American Journal of Cardiology, American Heart Journal, Evolutionary ecology research, Journal of the American College of Cardiology and Cancer.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact