Thomas Lane
Impact in
- Plant Science top 10%
- Plant Molecular Biology Research
- Legume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis
- Nematode management and characterization studies
- Plant Virus Research Studies
- Plant Parasitism and Resistance
- Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
Papers in
-
- Legume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis 3
- Nematode management and characterization studies 2
- Plant Molecular Biology Research 2
- Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology 1
- Horticultural and Viticultural Research 1
- Soybean genetics and cultivation 1
-
- Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies 2
- Co-authors
- Margaret Staton (7 shared papers)Aditi Rambani (2 shared papers)J. Hollis Rice (2 shared papers)Tarek Hewezi (2 shared papers)C. Neal Stewart (2 shared papers)Sarbottam Piya (1 shared paper)Mitra Mazarei (1 shared paper)Jinyi Liu (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- PLANT PHYSIOLOGY (3 papers)BMC Genomics (1 paper)Physiological Genomics (1 paper)Hereditas (1 paper)PLoS ONE (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaIndia
In The Last Decade
Thomas Lane
11 papers receiving 329 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
- Plant Science 234
- Horticulture 3
- Endocrinology 12
- Molecular Biology 139
- Insect Science 19
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Lane
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Lane's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Lane with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Lane more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Lane
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Lane. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Lane. The network helps show where Thomas Lane may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Lane, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2015 | 72 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 70 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 64 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 51 | |
| 5 | 2016 | 29 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 12 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 11 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 11 | |
| 9 | 2016 | 6 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 5 | |
| 11 | 2018 | 1 |
About Thomas Lane
Thomas Lane is a scholar working on Plant Science, Molecular Biology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Ecology and Environmental Chemistry, having authored 11 papers that have together received 332 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Legume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis (3 papers), Nematode management and characterization studies (2 papers), Plant Molecular Biology Research (2 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (2 papers), Turfgrass Adaptation and Management (2 papers), Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology (1 paper), Horticultural and Viticultural Research (1 paper) and Soybean genetics and cultivation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Plant Science (234 citations), Horticulture (3 citations), Endocrinology (12 citations), Molecular Biology (139 citations) and Insect Science (19 citations). Thomas Lane has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and India. Frequent co-authors include Margaret Staton, Aditi Rambani, J. Hollis Rice, Tarek Hewezi, C. Neal Stewart, Sarbottam Piya, Mitra Mazarei, Jinyi Liu, Priya Ranjan and Vince Pantalone. Their work appears in journals such as PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, BMC Genomics, Physiological Genomics, Hereditas and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.