John E. Carlson

16.1k total citations · 1 hit paper
188 papers, 7.7k citations indexed

About

John E. Carlson is a scholar working on Plant Science, Molecular Biology and Genetics. According to data from OpenAlex, John E. Carlson has authored 188 papers receiving a total of 7.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 73 papers in Plant Science, 63 papers in Molecular Biology and 30 papers in Genetics. Recurrent topics in John E. Carlson's work include Genetic diversity and population structure (24 papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (21 papers) and Plant and Fungal Interactions Research (19 papers). John E. Carlson is often cited by papers focused on Genetic diversity and population structure (24 papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (21 papers) and Plant and Fungal Interactions Research (19 papers). John E. Carlson collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and South Korea. John E. Carlson's co-authors include Christopher J. Frost, Abdelali Bara­kat, Mark C. Mescher, Consuelo Μ. De Moraes, Claude W. dePamphilis, Jim Leebens‐Mack, Ming Tien, Scott M. Geib, Kelli Hoover and Jeffrey C. Glaubitz and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Nucleic Acids Research and Nature Biotechnology.

In The Last Decade

John E. Carlson

179 papers receiving 7.3k citations

Hit Papers

Widespread genome duplications throughout the history of ... 2006 2026 2012 2019 2006 100 200 300 400 500

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
John E. Carlson United States 43 4.0k 3.1k 1.2k 1.2k 1.2k 188 7.7k
Philip M. Dixon United States 45 2.8k 0.7× 2.4k 0.8× 897 0.8× 1.6k 1.4× 812 0.7× 189 11.7k
Hidehiro Toh Japan 40 1.6k 0.4× 6.3k 2.0× 818 0.7× 1.0k 0.9× 1.7k 1.5× 106 11.2k
Lauren M. McIntyre United States 45 2.2k 0.5× 2.8k 0.9× 480 0.4× 912 0.8× 1.6k 1.4× 167 8.6k
Mark Bailey United Kingdom 58 3.4k 0.8× 4.5k 1.4× 457 0.4× 698 0.6× 730 0.6× 199 13.6k
J. E. Smith United Kingdom 50 1.2k 0.3× 1.7k 0.5× 962 0.8× 600 0.5× 544 0.5× 288 7.5k
Douglas M. Ruden United States 35 2.2k 0.6× 5.7k 1.8× 429 0.4× 489 0.4× 3.6k 3.1× 104 12.3k
Chengshu Wang China 54 3.1k 0.8× 4.5k 1.5× 5.5k 4.6× 399 0.3× 870 0.8× 189 9.7k
John Parkinson Canada 47 1.4k 0.3× 3.3k 1.1× 396 0.3× 503 0.4× 887 0.8× 152 8.5k
Eric W. Triplett United States 64 5.1k 1.3× 6.6k 2.1× 554 0.5× 482 0.4× 1.6k 1.4× 233 15.9k
Antonio González Spain 54 3.3k 0.8× 8.5k 2.7× 377 0.3× 544 0.5× 1.5k 1.3× 412 15.7k

Countries citing papers authored by John E. Carlson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John E. Carlson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John E. Carlson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John E. Carlson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John E. Carlson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John E. Carlson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John E. Carlson. The network helps show where John E. Carlson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John E. Carlson

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John E. Carlson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John E. Carlson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John E. Carlson. John E. Carlson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Bell, Terrence H., et al.. (2025). Bacterial Assembly in the Switchgrass Rhizosphere Is Shaped by Phylogeny, Host Genotype, and Growing Site. Phytobiomes Journal. 9(3). 468–484.
2.
Greenhawt, Matthew, Theresa Bingemann, James M. Tracy, et al.. (2025). Insect Allergy: Barriers in Training and Practice—A Work Group Report of the AAAAI Anaphylaxis Committee. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology In Practice. 13(3). 501–510.
3.
Bell, Terrence H., et al.. (2022). Host genomic influence on bacterial composition in the switchgrass rhizosphere. Molecular Ecology. 31(14). 3934–3950. 17 indexed citations
4.
Wang, Wanyan, Craig H. Carlson, Lawrence B. Smart, & John E. Carlson. (2020). Transcriptome analysis of contrasting resistance to herbivory by Empoasca fabae in two shrub willow species and their hybrid progeny. PLoS ONE. 15(7). e0236586–e0236586. 5 indexed citations
5.
Scully, Erin D., Scott M. Geib, Charles J. Mason, et al.. (2018). Host-plant induced changes in microbial community structure and midgut gene expression in an invasive polyphage (Anoplophora glabripennis). Scientific Reports. 8(1). 9620–9620. 24 indexed citations
6.
Herr, Joshua R., Erin D. Scully, Scott M. Geib, et al.. (2016). Genome Sequence of Fusarium Isolate MYA-4552 from the Midgut of Anoplophora glabripennis , an Invasive, Wood-Boring Beetle. Genome Announcements. 4(4). 13 indexed citations
7.
8.
Kremer, Antoine, Albert G. Abbott, John E. Carlson, et al.. (2012). Genomics of Fagaceae. Tree Genetics & Genomes. 8(3). 583–610. 93 indexed citations
9.
Frost, Christopher J., J. Dean, Mark C. Mescher, et al.. (2012). A petiole-galling insect herbivore decelerates leaf lamina litter decomposition rates. Functional Ecology. 26(3). 628–636. 15 indexed citations
10.
Geib, Scott M., María del Mar Jiménez-Gasco, John E. Carlson, Ming Tien, & Kelli Hoover. (2009). Effect of Host Tree Species on Cellulase Activity and Bacterial Community Composition in the Gut of Larval Asian Longhorned Beetle. Environmental Entomology. 38(3). 686–699. 68 indexed citations
11.
Morse, Alison M., Daniel G. Peterson, M. Nurul Islam‐Faridi, et al.. (2009). Evolution of Genome Size and Complexity in Pinus. PLoS ONE. 4(2). e4332–e4332. 126 indexed citations
12.
Cui, Liying, P. Kerr Wall, Jim Leebens‐Mack, et al.. (2006). Widespread genome duplications throughout the history of flowering plants. Genome Research. 16(6). 738–749. 554 indexed citations breakdown →
13.
Carlson, John E.. (2005). BIOLOGICAL DIMENSIONS OF THE GMO ISSUE. 1 indexed citations
14.
Traoré, Abdoulaye, et al.. (2005). Optimizing a Protocol for Sterilization and in vitro Establishment of Vegetative Buds from Mature Douglas Fir Trees. HortScience. 40(5). 1464–1468. 6 indexed citations
15.
Stewart, John H., et al.. (2003). Spatial digital database for the geologic map of Nevada. Antarctica A Keystone in a Changing World. 10 indexed citations
16.
Carlson, John E., Glenn V. Ostir, Sandra A. Black, et al.. (1999). Disability in Older Adults 2: Physical Activity as Prevention. Behavioral Medicine. 24(4). 157–168. 72 indexed citations
17.
Ellis, Brian E., et al.. (1999). cDNA cloning and heterologous expression of coniferin β-glucosidase. Plant Molecular Biology. 40(2). 365–372. 38 indexed citations
18.
Carlson, John E., et al.. (1997). Proceedings, 1997 Rapid Excavation and Tunneling Conference, Las Vegas, Nevada, June 22-25, 1997. 2 indexed citations
19.
Barrett, James P. & John E. Carlson. (1990). Adjusting Stocking Charts for Mixed Species Stands. Northern Journal of Applied Forestry. 7(2). 92–93.
20.
Carlson, John E., et al.. (1979). Drinking among Teenagers: Rural-Urban Comparison in Peer Influence.. Journal of alcohol and drug education. 24(3). 8–18. 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026