Thomas L. Serfass
- Ecology top 5%
- Genetics top 10%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 10%
- Small Animals top 5%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 10%
- Co-authors
- Robert P. BrooksOlin E. RhodesSadie S. StevensRod N. WilliamsChristen L. WilliamsWalter M. TzilkowskiJennifer A. FikeGuha Dharmarajan
- Topics
- Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (30 papers)Rangeland and Wildlife Management (14 papers)Fish Ecology and Management Studies (12 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSlovakiaCosta Rica
In The Last Decade
Thomas L. Serfass
52 papers receiving 537 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- Ecology 444
- Genetics 209
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 129
- Small Animals 90
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 71
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas L. Serfass
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas L. Serfass's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas L. Serfass with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas L. Serfass more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas L. Serfass
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas L. Serfass. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas L. Serfass. The network helps show where Thomas L. Serfass may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas L. Serfass
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas L. Serfass. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas L. Serfass based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas L. Serfass. Thomas L. Serfass is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 12 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 8 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 13 | |
| 8 | 16 | |
| 9 | SEASONAL VARIATION IN LATRINE SITE VISITATION AND SCENT MARKING BY NEARCTIC RIVER OTTERS (Lontra canadensis) | 3 |
| 10 | 25 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 65 | |
| 13 | 6 | |
| 14 | 46 | |
| 15 | 6 | |
| 16 | 25 | |
| 17 | 4 | |
| 18 | 7 | |
| 19 | 24 | |
| 20 | 7 |
About Thomas L. Serfass
Thomas L. Serfass is a scholar working on Ecology, Ecological Modeling and Small Animals, having authored 53 papers that have together received 611 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (30 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (14 papers) and Fish Ecology and Management Studies (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology (444 citations), Small Animals (90 citations) and Ecological Modeling (49 citations). Thomas L. Serfass has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Slovakia and Costa Rica. Frequent co-authors include Robert P. Brooks, Olin E. Rhodes, Sadie S. Stevens, Rod N. Williams, Christen L. Williams, Walter M. Tzilkowski, Jennifer A. Fike, Guha Dharmarajan, Richard Fritz and J. M. Novak. Their work appears in journals such as Environmental Science & Technology, Molecular Ecology and Journal of Wildlife Management.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.