Thomas Kaasgaard

19 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Thomas Kaasgaard
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Biomaterials 353
  • Pharmaceutical Science 74
  • Molecular Biology 688
  • Organic Chemistry 196
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 175
Replace Gemma C. Shearman with:
Gemma C. Shearman United Kingdom
Ewa Nazaruk Poland
Chiranjeevi Peetla United States
Renata Negrini Switzerland
Paola Brocca Italy
Galyna Gorbenko Ukraine
Cecilia Bombelli Italy
Nicolas Taulier France
Daniela Uhrı́ková Slovakia
Mats Silvander Sweden
Thomas Kaasgaard relative to Gemma C. Shearman United Kingdom Gemma C. Shearman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Gemma C. Shearman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Kaasgaard

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Kaasgaard's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Kaasgaard with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Kaasgaard more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Kaasgaard

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Kaasgaard. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Kaasgaard. The network helps show where Thomas Kaasgaard may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Kaasgaard, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Kaasgaard Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Kaasgaard links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 2006226
2 2010151
3 2003118
4 200292
5 201091
6 200664
7 200560
8 200136
9 200834
10 200131
11 201031
12 200324
13 200524
14 200220
15 201016
16 202212
17
In Situ Atomic Force Microscope Imaging of Phospholipase A2 Hydrolysis of One- and Two-component Phospholipid Bilayers
20014
18 20013
19
Investigation of lipid membrane organization, morphology, and dynamics by atomic force microscopy of supported bilayers
20042

About Thomas Kaasgaard

Thomas Kaasgaard is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Biomaterials, Biomedical Engineering and Organic Chemistry, having authored 19 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior (12 papers), Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications (6 papers), RNA Interference and Gene Delivery (5 papers), Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery (4 papers), Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics (3 papers), Surfactants and Colloidal Systems (3 papers), Molecular Sensors and Ion Detection (2 papers) and Supramolecular Self-Assembly in Materials (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biomaterials (353 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (74 citations), Molecular Biology (688 citations), Organic Chemistry (196 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (175 citations). Thomas Kaasgaard has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Thomas L. Andresen, Calum J. Drummond, Kent Jørgensen, Ole G. Mouritsen, Chad Leidy, David H. Thompson, John H. Crowe, Morten Ø. Jensen, John H. Ipsen and Simon S. Jensen. Their work appears in journals such as Biophysical Journal, FEBS Letters, International Journal of Pharmaceutics, European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics and Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact