Thomas J. Williams

77 total papers · 920 total citations
22 papers, 797 citations indexed

About

Thomas J. Williams is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Molecular Biology and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Thomas J. Williams has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 797 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Organic Chemistry, 2 papers in Molecular Biology and 2 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Thomas J. Williams's work include Catalytic Cross-Coupling Reactions (12 papers), Catalytic C–H Functionalization Methods (10 papers) and Cyclopropane Reaction Mechanisms (4 papers). Thomas J. Williams is often cited by papers focused on Catalytic Cross-Coupling Reactions (12 papers), Catalytic C–H Functionalization Methods (10 papers) and Cyclopropane Reaction Mechanisms (4 papers). Thomas J. Williams collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Iran. Thomas J. Williams's co-authors include Ian J. S. Fairlamb, Alan J. Reay, Adrian C. Whitwood, Philip M. Piccoli, Philip A. Candela, Sara De Ornellas, Christoph G. Baumann, Thomas E. Storr, Kenneth D. Bauer and Walter W. Hauck and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, Chemical Communications and Tetrahedron.

In The Last Decade

Thomas J. Williams

22 papers receiving 782 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Thomas J. Williams 470 133 105 94 77 22 797
Kerong Chen 51 0.1× 283 2.1× 22 0.2× 55 0.6× 16 0.2× 44 921
Xiang Wu 338 0.7× 255 1.9× 35 0.3× 10 0.1× 13 0.2× 65 926
Xunhui Xu 342 0.7× 86 0.6× 34 0.3× 26 0.3× 12 0.2× 31 825
Elisabeth Miot-Noirault 79 0.2× 282 2.1× 10 0.1× 73 0.8× 12 0.2× 35 709
Cheng Zhang 706 1.5× 97 0.7× 93 0.9× 15 0.2× 6 0.1× 37 1.0k
Cécile Dumas 303 0.6× 179 1.3× 64 0.6× 15 0.2× 2 0.0× 32 943
Isabelle Kieffer 29 0.1× 198 1.5× 46 0.4× 41 0.4× 12 0.2× 34 716
Jinlian Wang 118 0.3× 420 3.2× 6 0.1× 10 0.1× 19 0.2× 36 866
J. Chen 261 0.6× 63 0.5× 7 0.1× 19 0.2× 26 0.3× 23 1.0k
Yawen Zhang 101 0.2× 113 0.8× 51 0.5× 8 0.1× 6 0.1× 37 912

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas J. Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas J. Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas J. Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas J. Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas J. Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas J. Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas J. Williams. The network helps show where Thomas J. Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas J. Williams

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas J. Williams. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas J. Williams based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas J. Williams. Thomas J. Williams is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026