Thomas J. Lorenzen

20 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers

Thomas J. Lorenzen
Comparison fields: 5 of 137
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 1.2k
  • Management Science and Operations Research 847
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 535
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 340
  • Statistics and Probability 320
Replace Acheson J. Duncan with:
Acheson J. Duncan United States
Kenneth E. Case United States
Fred Spiring Canada
Murat Külahçı Denmark
Sung H. Park South Korea
Byung Rae Cho United States
Roy E. Lave United States
Anne C. Shoemaker United States
Amirhossein Amiri Iran
Shing I. Chang United States
Thomas J. Lorenzen relative to Acheson J. Duncan United States Acheson J. Duncan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×9.4×
Acheson J. Duncan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas J. Lorenzen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas J. Lorenzen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas J. Lorenzen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas J. Lorenzen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas J. Lorenzen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas J. Lorenzen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas J. Lorenzen. The network helps show where Thomas J. Lorenzen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas J. Lorenzen

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas J. Lorenzen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas J. Lorenzen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas J. Lorenzen. Thomas J. Lorenzen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1
Response to William H. Woodall
0
2 1
3 7
4 142
5 309
6 3
7 64
8 414
9 138
10 357
11 141
12 440
13 21
14 4
15 9
16 8
17 3
18 8
19 3
20
TOWARD A MORE REALISTIC FORMULATION OF THE SECRETARY PROBLEM.
1

About Thomas J. Lorenzen

Thomas J. Lorenzen is a scholar working on Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Management Science and Operations Research and Statistics and Probability, having authored 23 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring (5 papers), Optimal Experimental Design Methods (5 papers) and Optimization and Search Problems (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (1.2k citations), Management Science and Operations Research (847 citations) and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (535 citations). Thomas J. Lorenzen has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Egypt. Frequent co-authors include Lonnie C. Vance, William H. Woodall, William J. Welch, Shin Taguchi, James M. Lucas, Raymond H. Myers, Anne C. Shoemaker, Vijayan N. Nair, Jock MacKay and Bovas Abraham. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Statistical Association, Technometrics and Journal of Applied Physiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026