Thomas J. D. Halliday
- Paleontology top 5%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 10%
- Geometry and Topology top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Ecology
- Co-authors
- Anjali GoswamiPaul UpchurchMark A. BellAsif U. TamuriMario dos ReisZiheng YangDavid L. FoxAnne‐Claire Fabre
- Topics
- Evolution and Paleontology Studies (12 papers)Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology (10 papers)Morphological variations and asymmetry (5 papers)
- Journals
- SciencePhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological SciencesProceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
- Partner nations
- United KingdomIndiaSpain
In The Last Decade
Thomas J. D. Halliday
13 papers receiving 375 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
- Paleontology 316
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 77
- Geometry and Topology 75
- Molecular Biology 68
- Ecology 63
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas J. D. Halliday
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas J. D. Halliday's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas J. D. Halliday with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas J. D. Halliday more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas J. D. Halliday
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas J. D. Halliday. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas J. D. Halliday. The network helps show where Thomas J. D. Halliday may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas J. D. Halliday
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas J. D. Halliday. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas J. D. Halliday based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas J. D. Halliday. Thomas J. D. Halliday is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 7 | |
| 3 | 37 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 11 | |
| 6 | 27 | |
| 7 | 28 | |
| 8 | 39 | |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | 16 | |
| 11 | 7 | |
| 12 | 77 | |
| 13 | 57 | |
| 14 | 44 | |
| 15 | 21 |
About Thomas J. D. Halliday
Thomas J. D. Halliday is a scholar working on Paleontology, Geometry and Topology and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 15 papers that have together received 378 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Evolution and Paleontology Studies (12 papers), Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology (10 papers) and Morphological variations and asymmetry (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Paleontology (316 citations), Geometry and Topology (75 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (59 citations). Thomas J. D. Halliday has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, India and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Anjali Goswami, Paul Upchurch, Mark A. Bell, Asif U. Tamuri, Mario dos Reis, Ziheng Yang, David L. Fox, Anne‐Claire Fabre, Brian L. Beatty and Ryan N. Felice. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences and Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.