Thomas J. Christensen
- Political Science and International Relations top 0.5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 2%
- Development top 0.5%
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- Surgery
- Co-authors
- Jack SnyderDonald S. ZagoriaEric R. WagnerBassem T. ElhassanErik N. KubiakAlexander Y. ShinDaniel S. HorwitzShefali Samant
- Topics
- International Relations and Foreign Policy (14 papers)Political Conflict and Governance (5 papers)Global Peace and Security Dynamics (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaGermany
In The Last Decade
Thomas J. Christensen
38 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
- Political Science and International Relations 1.1k
- Sociology and Political Science 688
- Development 295
- Economics and Econometrics 175
- Surgery 149
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas J. Christensen
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas J. Christensen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas J. Christensen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas J. Christensen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas J. Christensen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas J. Christensen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas J. Christensen. The network helps show where Thomas J. Christensen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas J. Christensen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas J. Christensen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas J. Christensen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas J. Christensen. Thomas J. Christensen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 16 | |
| 6 | Obama and Asia | 2 |
| 7 | 18 | |
| 8 | 8 | |
| 9 | 75 | |
| 10 | 16 | |
| 11 | The Advantages of an Assertive China | 27 |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 108 | |
| 16 | 7 | |
| 17 | 17 | |
| 18 | 51 | |
| 19 | Chinese Realpolitik: Reading Beijing's World-View | 24 |
| 20 | 2 |
About Thomas J. Christensen
Thomas J. Christensen is a scholar working on Development, Political Science and International Relations and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 39 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include International Relations and Foreign Policy (14 papers), Political Conflict and Governance (5 papers) and Global Peace and Security Dynamics (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Development (295 citations), Political Science and International Relations (1.1k citations) and Sociology and Political Science (688 citations). Thomas J. Christensen has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Jack Snyder, Donald S. Zagoria, Eric R. Wagner, Bassem T. Elhassan, Erik N. Kubiak, Alexander Y. Shin, Daniel S. Horwitz, Shefali Samant, Jennifer Lind and Jack S. Levy. Their work appears in journals such as American Political Science Review, Foreign Affairs and International Organization.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.