Thomas Hardie

1.5k citations
60 papers · 974 · h-index 21

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Hardie

58 papers receiving 923 citations

Peers

Thomas Hardie
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Clinical Psychology 273
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 40
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 212
  • Biological Psychiatry 25
  • Health 84
Replace Versie Johnson‐Mallard with:
Versie Johnson‐Mallard United States
Linghua Kong China
Lisa Martin United States
Marta Makara‐Studzińska Poland
Gail Erlick Robinson Canada
Elise L. Lev United States
Jodi L. Ford United States
A. Kaplan De-Nour Israel
Christine Reynaert Belgium
Karen G. Schepp United States
Thomas Hardie relative to Versie Johnson‐Mallard United States Versie Johnson‐Mallard's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Versie Johnson‐Mallard · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Hardie

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Hardie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Hardie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Hardie more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Hardie

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Hardie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Hardie. The network helps show where Thomas Hardie may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Hardie, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Hardie Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Hardie links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 60 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201365
2 200252
3 200249
4 200749
5 200843
6 201441
7 201838
8 200037
9 199736
10 201332
11 201530
12 201430
13 200227
14 201427
15 200126
16 200625
17 201222
18 201821
19 200821
20 201320

About Thomas Hardie

Thomas Hardie is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Epidemiology, having authored 60 papers that have together received 974 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Family Support in Illness (9 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (6 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (5 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (5 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (5 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (4 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (3 papers) and Emergency and Acute Care Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (273 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (40 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (212 citations), Biological Psychiatry (25 citations) and Health (84 citations). Thomas Hardie has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include David Baron, Howard B. Moss, Paula Klemm, Kevin G. Lynch, Barbara Ott, Ellen M. Volpe, Janet A. Deatrick, Catherine Cerulli, Wendy L. Hobbie and Lamia P. Barakat. Their work appears in journals such as Oncology nursing forum, Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing, Journal of Transcultural Nursing, Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing and Psycho-Oncology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact