Thomas H. Squire

32 total papers · 696 total citations
24 papers, 553 citations indexed

About

Thomas H. Squire is a scholar working on Aerospace Engineering, Applied Mathematics and Computational Mechanics. According to data from OpenAlex, Thomas H. Squire has authored 24 papers receiving a total of 553 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Aerospace Engineering, 13 papers in Applied Mathematics and 7 papers in Computational Mechanics. Recurrent topics in Thomas H. Squire's work include Gas Dynamics and Kinetic Theory (13 papers), Spacecraft and Cryogenic Technologies (5 papers) and Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics (4 papers). Thomas H. Squire is often cited by papers focused on Gas Dynamics and Kinetic Theory (13 papers), Spacecraft and Cryogenic Technologies (5 papers) and Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics (4 papers). Thomas H. Squire collaborates with scholars based in United States. Thomas H. Squire's co-authors include Jochen Marschall, F. Milos, Y.-K. Chen, Frank S. Milos, Daniel J. Rasky, Bernard Laub, Parul Agrawal, Michael Wright, Yih-Kanq Chen and D. F. Jankowski and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Fluid Mechanics, Journal of the American Ceramic Society and Journal of the European Ceramic Society.

In The Last Decade

Thomas H. Squire

23 papers receiving 532 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Thomas H. Squire 278 255 231 174 155 24 553
Bernd Helber 127 0.5× 106 0.4× 226 1.0× 148 0.9× 302 1.9× 42 577
D. M. Van Wie 211 0.8× 184 0.7× 182 0.8× 228 1.3× 52 0.3× 19 536
D. Paterna 187 0.7× 237 0.9× 177 0.8× 139 0.8× 125 0.8× 27 616
Giuseppe D. Di Martino 376 1.4× 349 1.4× 286 1.2× 245 1.4× 71 0.5× 29 677
А. Н. Гордеев 322 1.2× 331 1.3× 248 1.1× 80 0.5× 98 0.6× 51 512
Huy Tran 34 0.1× 47 0.2× 182 0.8× 316 1.8× 419 2.7× 24 594
Burkard Esser 39 0.1× 165 0.6× 43 0.2× 276 1.6× 212 1.4× 41 549
G. Neuer 52 0.2× 247 1.0× 260 1.1× 266 1.5× 18 0.1× 26 643
Bernard Laub 29 0.1× 38 0.1× 94 0.4× 355 2.0× 371 2.4× 37 561
Alessandro Turchi 23 0.1× 36 0.1× 106 0.5× 257 1.5× 313 2.0× 41 516

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas H. Squire

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas H. Squire's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas H. Squire with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas H. Squire more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas H. Squire

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas H. Squire. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas H. Squire. The network helps show where Thomas H. Squire may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas H. Squire

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas H. Squire. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas H. Squire based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas H. Squire. Thomas H. Squire is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026