Thomas Galetin
- Surgery
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
- Emergency Medicine top 10%
- Oncology
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
- Co-authors
- Karl‐Heinz VestweberAndreas D. RinkErich StoelbenAris KoryllosJérôme DefosseÉ StraubMark SchierenCorinna Ludwig
- Topics
- Pleural and Pulmonary Diseases (7 papers)Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (6 papers)Airway Management and Intubation Techniques (5 papers)
- Cited by
- Emergency MedicineCritical Care and Intensive Care MedicineAnesthesiology and Pain Medicine
- Partner nations
- GermanyIndiaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Thomas Galetin
26 papers receiving 233 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
- Surgery 157
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 91
- Emergency Medicine 52
- Oncology 45
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 25
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Galetin
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Galetin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Galetin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Galetin more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Galetin
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Galetin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Galetin. The network helps show where Thomas Galetin may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas Galetin
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas Galetin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas Galetin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas Galetin. Thomas Galetin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 17 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 11 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 61 | |
| 15 | 16 | |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 46 | |
| 19 | 6 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Thomas Galetin
Thomas Galetin is a scholar working on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 27 papers that have together received 242 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pleural and Pulmonary Diseases (7 papers), Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (6 papers) and Airway Management and Intubation Techniques (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Emergency Medicine (52 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (25 citations) and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (24 citations). Thomas Galetin has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, India and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Karl‐Heinz Vestweber, Andreas D. Rink, Erich Stoelben, Aris Koryllos, Jérôme Defosse, É Straub, Mark Schieren, Corinna Ludwig, Toni Schneider and Filomain Nguemo. Their work appears in journals such as Surgical Endoscopy, European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery and Journal of Surgical Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.