Mark Schieren

30 papers receiving 328 citations

Peers

Mark Schieren
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 119
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 41
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 146
  • Emergency Medicine 41
  • Emergency Medical Services 16
Replace Mathew Patteril with:
Mathew Patteril United Kingdom
Sasanka S. Dhara Singapore
Stefano Catarci Italy
Gabriella Giurati Italy
R Rosi Italy
Tülay Hoşten Türkiye
Nilay Chatterjee India
Michael Gugel Germany
Jinyoung Bae South Korea
Samuel Metz United States
Mark Schieren relative to Mathew Patteril United Kingdom Mathew Patteril's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.0×
Mathew Patteril · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Schieren

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Schieren's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Schieren with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Schieren more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Schieren

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Schieren. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Schieren. The network helps show where Mark Schieren may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Schieren, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Schieren Line = papers co-authored together Mark Schieren links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201741
2 201740
3 201732
4 202126
5 201623
6 201919
7 201818
8 201818
9 202116
10 201914
11 201812
12 201810
13 202010
14 202010
15 20219
16 20228
17 20177
18 20196
19 20215
20 20174

About Mark Schieren

Mark Schieren is a scholar working on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Surgery and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 35 papers that have together received 355 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Airway Management and Intubation Techniques (6 papers), Tracheal and airway disorders (6 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (4 papers), Ultrasound in Clinical Applications (3 papers), Trauma Management and Diagnosis (3 papers), Foreign Body Medical Cases (2 papers), Blood transfusion and management (2 papers) and Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (119 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (41 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (146 citations), Emergency Medicine (41 citations) and Emergency Medical Services (16 citations). Mark Schieren has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Jérôme Defosse, Frank Wappler, Andreas B. Böhmer, Mark Ulrich Gerbershagen, Aris Koryllos, Erich Stoelben, Fabian Dusse, Lefering Rolf, Tanja Rombey and Dawid Pieper. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, Injury, Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology, BMC Anesthesiology and European Journal of Anaesthesiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact