Countries citing papers authored by Thomas F. Rutherford
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas F. Rutherford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas F. Rutherford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas F. Rutherford more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas F. Rutherford
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas F. Rutherford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas F. Rutherford. The network helps show where Thomas F. Rutherford may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas F. Rutherford
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas F. Rutherford.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas F. Rutherford based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas F. Rutherford. Thomas F. Rutherford is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Harrison, Glenn W., Thomas F. Rutherford, & Ian Wooton. (2016). The Economic Impact of the European Community. American Economic Review. 79(2). 288–294.2 indexed citations
5.
Böhringer, Christoph, et al.. (2014). The Environmental Implications of Russia's Accession to the World Trade Organization. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.1 indexed citations
6.
Balistreri, Edward J. & Thomas F. Rutherford. (2013). Computing General Equilibrium Theories of Monopolistic Competition and Heterogeneous Firms. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 1. 1513–1570.5 indexed citations
Böhringer, Christoph & Thomas F. Rutherford. (2006). Combining Top-Down and Bottom-Up in Energy Policy Analysis: A Decomposition Approach. MADOC (University of Mannheim).15 indexed citations
11.
Rutherford, Thomas F., et al.. (2003). Free Trade Area of the Americas. An impact Assessment for Colombia. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.5 indexed citations
12.
Tarr, David G., Glenn W. Harrison, & Thomas F. Rutherford. (2003). Chile¿s Regional Arrangements: the Importance of Market Access and Lowering the Tariff to Six Percent. 9(238). 1–34.7 indexed citations
13.
Harrison, Glenn W., Thomas F. Rutherford, David G. Tarr, & Angelo Gurgel. (2003). Politicas de comercio regionais, multilaterais e unilaterais do Mercosul para o crescimento economico e a reducao da pobreza no Brasil. LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas). 33(1). 1–60.10 indexed citations
Rutherford, Thomas F., et al.. (2002). A dynamic general equilibrium model for tax policy analysis in Colombia. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.2 indexed citations
16.
Böhringer, Christoph & Thomas F. Rutherford. (2002). In Search of a Rationale for Differentiated Environmental Taxes. MADOC (University of Mannheim).4 indexed citations
Rutherford, Thomas F., et al.. (2001). A General Equilibrium Model for Tax Policy Analysis in Colombia.8 indexed citations
19.
Harrison, Glenn W., David G. Tarr, & Thomas F. Rutherford. (1997). Opciones de Política Comercial para Chile: Una Evaluación Cuantitativa. Latin american journal of economics. 34(102). 1–37.11 indexed citations
20.
Lopez-de-Silane, Florencio, James R. Markusen, & Thomas F. Rutherford. (1993). Anti-Competitive and Rent-Shifting Aspects of Domestic-Content Provisions in Regional Trade Blocks. National Bureau of Economic Research.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.