Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Measuring the immeasurable — A survey of sustainability indices
2007636 citationsChristoph Böhringer et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Christoph Böhringer
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Christoph Böhringer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christoph Böhringer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christoph Böhringer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Christoph Böhringer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christoph Böhringer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christoph Böhringer. The network helps show where Christoph Böhringer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Christoph Böhringer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Christoph Böhringer.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Christoph Böhringer based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Christoph Böhringer. Christoph Böhringer is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Böhringer, Christoph, Brita Bye, Taran Fæhn, & Knut Einar Rosendahl. (2014). Output-Based Rebating of Carbon Taxes in the Neighbor's Backyard. Competitiveness, Leakage and Welfare. Econstor (Econstor).1 indexed citations
9.
Böhringer, Christoph, et al.. (2014). Energy security indicators: are they helpful in assessing policies addressing energy security?.1 indexed citations
10.
Böhringer, Christoph, et al.. (2014). The Environmental Implications of Russia's Accession to the World Trade Organization. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.1 indexed citations
11.
Böhringer, Christoph. (2013). Two Decades of European Climate Policy: A Critical Appraisal. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
Böhringer, Christoph & Knut Einar Rosendahl. (2009). Green serves the dirtiest : on the interacion between black and green quotas. SSRN Electronic Journal.17 indexed citations
Böhringer, Christoph & Andreas Löschel. (2005). Computable General Equilibrium Models for Sustainability Impact Assessment: Status Quo and Prospects. SSRN Electronic Journal.2 indexed citations
16.
Böhringer, Christoph. (2003). The Kyoto Protocol: A Review and Perspectives. MADOC (University of Mannheim).35 indexed citations
17.
Böhringer, Christoph. (2002). Das gesamtwirtschaftliche Modell PACE-L zur Analyse von Arbeitsmarktpolitiken.1 indexed citations
18.
Boeters, Stefan, et al.. (2002). Taxation and unemployment: an applied general equilibrium approach for Germany. Econstor (Econstor).16 indexed citations
Böhringer, Christoph & Thomas F. Rutherford. (2002). In Search of a Rationale for Differentiated Environmental Taxes. MADOC (University of Mannheim).4 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.