Thomas Eberlein
Impact in
- Rehabilitation top 0.5%
- Wound Healing and Treatments
- Occupational Therapy top 1%
- Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management
Papers in ⓘ
-
- Wound Healing and Treatments 28
-
- Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management 16
- Co-authors
- Thomas Wild (4 shared papers)Anneke Andriessen (12 shared papers)Arastoo Nia (1 shared paper)L. Sobótka (1 shared paper)Ojan Assadian (5 shared papers)Robert Strohal (3 shared papers)Axel Krämer (4 shared papers)Joachim Dissemond (4 shared papers)
In The Last Decade
Thomas Eberlein
33 papers receiving 804 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
- Rehabilitation 560
- Occupational Therapy 207
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 159
- Biomaterials 105
- Surgery 349
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Eberlein
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Eberlein's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Eberlein with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Eberlein more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Eberlein
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Eberlein. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Eberlein. The network helps show where Thomas Eberlein may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Eberlein, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2010 | 232 | |
| 2 | 2012 | 66 | |
| 3 | 2011 | 64 | |
| 4 | 2010 | 49 | |
| 5 | 2002 | 47 | |
| 6 | Assessment of a wound cleansing solution in the treatment of problem wounds. | 2008 | 46 |
| 7 | Konsensusempfehlung zur Auswahl von Wirkstoffen fur die Wundantiseptik | 2004 | 42 |
| 8 | 2010 | 40 | |
| 9 | 2011 | 39 | |
| 10 | 2005 | 33 | |
| 11 | 2012 | 28 | |
| 12 | 2009 | 25 | |
| 13 | 2019 | 23 | |
| 14 | 2018 | 18 | |
| 15 | 2022 | 16 | |
| 16 | 2010 | 13 | |
| 17 | 2011 | 12 | |
| 18 | 2017 | 12 | |
| 19 | 2014 | 12 | |
| 20 | Wound cleansing efficacy of two cellulose-based dressings | 2010 | 9 |
About Thomas Eberlein
Thomas Eberlein is a scholar working on Rehabilitation, Occupational Therapy, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Dermatology and Surgery, having authored 34 papers that have together received 867 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Wound Healing and Treatments (28 papers), Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management (16 papers), Surgical Sutures and Adhesives (10 papers), Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management (10 papers), Surgical site infection prevention (5 papers), Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases (3 papers), Antimicrobial agents and applications (3 papers) and Dermatologic Treatments and Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (560 citations), Occupational Therapy (207 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (159 citations), Biomaterials (105 citations) and Surgery (349 citations). Thomas Eberlein has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Austria and Bahrain. Frequent co-authors include Thomas Wild, Anneke Andriessen, Arastoo Nia, L. Sobótka, Ojan Assadian, Robert Strohal, Axel Krämer, Joachim Dissemond, Martin Abel and Jürg Traber. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Wound Care, Journal of Drugs in Dermatology, Skin Pharmacology and Physiology, Nutrition and Journal of Tissue Viability.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.