Thomas E. Lockwood

723 citations
34 papers · 508 indexed · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas E. Lockwood

31 papers receiving 488 citations

Peers

Thomas E. Lockwood
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Analytical Chemistry 154
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 90
  • Pollution 70
  • Spectroscopy 97
  • Environmental Chemistry 43
Replace Douglas M. Goltz with:
Douglas M. Goltz Canada
Peter Leonhard Germany
Adam Sajnóg Poland
Zsolt Stefánka Hungary
А. А. Ганеев Russia
Noriyuki YAMADA Japan
Tsutomu Nomizu Japan
Robert Koeber Germany
Édith Nicol France
Vikki A. Carolan United Kingdom
Thomas E. Lockwood relative to Douglas M. Goltz Canada Douglas M. Goltz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Douglas M. Goltz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas E. Lockwood

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas E. Lockwood's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas E. Lockwood with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas E. Lockwood more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas E. Lockwood

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas E. Lockwood. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas E. Lockwood. The network helps show where Thomas E. Lockwood may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas E. Lockwood, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas E. Lockwood Line = papers co-authored together Thomas E. Lockwood links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202156
2 197452
3 202149
4 197643
5 201938
6 201932
7 202230
8 200625
9 202123
10 202221
11 202319
12 202119
13 202018
14 202316
15 202414
16 20249
17 20247
18 20235
19 20205
20 20244

About Thomas E. Lockwood

Thomas E. Lockwood is a scholar working on Analytical Chemistry, Spectroscopy, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Surfaces, Coatings and Films and Pollution, having authored 34 papers that have together received 508 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (9 papers), Analytical chemistry methods development (8 papers), Ion-surface interactions and analysis (5 papers), Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols (3 papers), Biosensors and Analytical Detection (3 papers), Mercury impact and mitigation studies (2 papers), Heavy metals in environment (2 papers) and Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Analytical Chemistry (154 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (90 citations), Pollution (70 citations), Spectroscopy (97 citations) and Environmental Chemistry (43 citations). Thomas E. Lockwood has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Austria. Frequent co-authors include David Clases, Raquel González de Vega, Philip Doble, Mika T. Westerhausen, H. R. Morgan, H B Bosmann, David Bishop, Lukas Schlatt, Lewis B. Sheiner and Renato L. Galeazzi. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry, Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, Analytical Chemistry, Planta and Environmental Science Nano.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026