Thomas E. Burk
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 1%
- Global and Planetary Change top 2%
- Environmental Engineering top 2%
- Ecology top 5%
- Mechanical Engineering top 10%
- Co-authors
- Alan R. EkJ.C.G. GoelzGöran I. ÅgrenJ. J. LandsbergChadwick Dearing OliverAnnikki MäkeläMichael T. Ter‐MikaelianPasi Puttonen
- Topics
- Forest ecology and management (46 papers)Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications (19 papers)Forest Management and Policy (18 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaRemote Sensing of EnvironmentForest Ecology and Management
- Partner nations
- United StatesFinlandGermany
In The Last Decade
Thomas E. Burk
75 papers receiving 1.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 1.1k
- Global and Planetary Change 995
- Environmental Engineering 550
- Ecology 297
- Mechanical Engineering 180
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas E. Burk
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas E. Burk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas E. Burk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas E. Burk more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas E. Burk
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas E. Burk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas E. Burk. The network helps show where Thomas E. Burk may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas E. Burk
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas E. Burk. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas E. Burk based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas E. Burk. Thomas E. Burk is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Assessment of Carbon Flows Associated with Forest Management and Biomass Procurement for the Laskin Biomass Facility | 5 |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 10 | |
| 4 | 18 | |
| 5 | 17 | |
| 6 | 16 | |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | 290 | |
| 9 | 12 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | Models as tools for forest management planning | 3 |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | Satellite inventory of Minnesota forest resources | 153 |
| 14 | 4 | |
| 15 | 20 | |
| 16 | 171 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | 41 | |
| 19 | 52 | |
| 20 | 10 |
About Thomas E. Burk
Thomas E. Burk is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Global and Planetary Change and Environmental Engineering, having authored 83 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forest ecology and management (46 papers), Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications (19 papers) and Forest Management and Policy (18 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (1.1k citations), Global and Planetary Change (995 citations) and Environmental Engineering (550 citations). Thomas E. Burk has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Finland and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Alan R. Ek, J.C.G. Goelz, Göran I. Ågren, J. J. Landsberg, Chadwick Dearing Oliver, Annikki Mäkelä, Michael T. Ter‐Mikaelian, Pasi Puttonen, Stephen R. Shifley and Christopher B. Edgar. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Remote Sensing of Environment and Forest Ecology and Management.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.