Thomas Dietel

776 citations
12 papers · 680 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

    • Organometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis 6
    • Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods 4
    • Catalytic Cross-Coupling Reactions 3
    • Catalytic C–H Functionalization Methods 3
    • Nanomaterials for catalytic reactions 2
    • N-Heterocyclic Carbenes in Organic and Inorganic Chemistry 2
    • Asymmetric Hydrogenation and Catalysis 6

Thomas Dietel

12 papers receiving 677 citations

Peers

Thomas Dietel
Comparison fields: 5 of 31
  • Process Chemistry and Technology 189
  • Inorganic Chemistry 507
  • Organic Chemistry 505
  • Catalysis 47
  • Biomedical Engineering 140
Replace Dennis Pingen with:
Dennis Pingen Germany
Shuhei Kusumoto Japan
Peter E. Sues Canada
Jacorien Coetzee United Kingdom
T. Ott Switzerland
Yehoshoa Ben David Israel
Jeremy M. John United States
Sara C. A. Sousa Portugal
Michael G. Manas United States
Akira Shiibashi Japan
Thomas Dietel relative to Dennis Pingen Germany Dennis Pingen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Dennis Pingen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Dietel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Dietel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Dietel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Dietel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Dietel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Dietel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Dietel. The network helps show where Thomas Dietel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Dietel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Dietel Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Dietel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 2016284
2 2018134
3 201686
4 201757
5 202237
6 201824
7 201821
8 201315
9 201913
10 20204
11 20243
12 20242

About Thomas Dietel

Thomas Dietel is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Inorganic Chemistry, Oncology, Pharmaceutical Science and Process Chemistry and Technology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 680 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Organometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis (6 papers), Asymmetric Hydrogenation and Catalysis (6 papers), Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods (4 papers), Catalytic Cross-Coupling Reactions (3 papers), Catalytic C–H Functionalization Methods (3 papers), Nanomaterials for catalytic reactions (2 papers), N-Heterocyclic Carbenes in Organic and Inorganic Chemistry (2 papers) and Metal complexes synthesis and properties (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Process Chemistry and Technology (189 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (507 citations), Organic Chemistry (505 citations), Catalysis (47 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (140 citations). Thomas Dietel has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Slovakia and China. Frequent co-authors include Rhett Kempe, Fabian Kallmeier, Τ. Irrgang, Guoying Zhang, W. Kretschmer, A. Gollwitzer, Rainer Schobert, Konstantin Press, Moshe Kol and Jana Kašpárková. Their work appears in journals such as Dalton Transactions, Angewandte Chemie International Edition, Science, Nature Communications and Journal of Catalysis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact