Thomas de Waal
- Political Science and International Relations top 2%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Economics and Econometrics
- General Health Professions
- Cultural Studies top 5%
- Topics
- Post-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics (8 papers)Metallurgy and Cultural Artifacts (2 papers)Soviet and Russian History (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Thomas de Waal
16 papers receiving 288 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
- Political Science and International Relations 310
- Sociology and Political Science 193
- Economics and Econometrics 45
- General Health Professions 43
- Cultural Studies 29
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas de Waal
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas de Waal's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas de Waal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas de Waal more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas de Waal
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas de Waal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas de Waal. The network helps show where Thomas de Waal may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas de Waal
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas de Waal. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas de Waal based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas de Waal. Thomas de Waal is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Azerbaijan Doesn't Want To Be Western | 3 |
| 2 | Great Catastrophe: Armenians and Turks in the Shadow of Genocide | 25 |
| 3 | 29 | |
| 4 | Black Garden: Armenia and Azerbaijan Through Peace and War, 10th Year Anniversary Edition, Revised and Updated | 5 |
| 5 | 20 | |
| 6 | Georgia's Choices: Charting a Future in Uncertain Times | 22 |
| 7 | 26 | |
| 8 | The Caucasus: An Introduction | 51 |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 129 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | A dirty war : a Russian reporter in Chechnya | 29 |
| 14 | 12 | |
| 15 | 33 | |
| 16 | Chechnya: Calamity in the Caucasus | 14 |
About Thomas de Waal
Thomas de Waal is a scholar working on Archeology, Political Science and International Relations and Anthropology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 405 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Post-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics (8 papers), Metallurgy and Cultural Artifacts (2 papers) and Soviet and Russian History (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Energy (16 citations), Political Science and International Relations (310 citations) and Archeology (6 citations). Thomas de Waal has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Robert Legvold, J. W. Crowfoot, Anatol Lieven, Edgar O’Ballance and James Satterwhite. Their work appears in journals such as Foreign Affairs, Europe Asia Studies and The Slavic and East European Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.