Thomas de Lange
- Oncology top 2%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 2%
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics top 5%
- Artificial Intelligence top 2%
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition top 2%
- Co-authors
- T. P. MartinH. GöhlichMichael A. RieglerPål HalvorsenKonstantin PogorelovSigrun Losada EskelandCarsten GriwodzDag Johansen
- Topics
- Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (57 papers)Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (28 papers)Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques (15 papers)
- Journals
- Physical Review LettersSHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaGastroenterology
In The Last Decade
Thomas de Lange
135 papers receiving 3.3k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 169
- Oncology 1.1k
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 616
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 589
- Artificial Intelligence 566
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 537
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas de Lange
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas de Lange's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas de Lange with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas de Lange more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas de Lange
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas de Lange. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas de Lange. The network helps show where Thomas de Lange may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas de Lange
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas de Lange. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas de Lange based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas de Lange. Thomas de Lange is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 11 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 64 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 13 | |
| 8 | Medico multimedia task at MediaEval 2018 | 3 |
| 9 | 10 | |
| 10 | 5 | |
| 11 | A Comparison of Deep Learning with Global Features for Gastrointestinal Disease Detection. | 4 |
| 12 | 31 | |
| 13 | 22 | |
| 14 | 25 | |
| 15 | 3 | |
| 16 | 18 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | 5 | |
| 19 | 35 | |
| 20 | 4 |
About Thomas de Lange
Thomas de Lange is a scholar working on Medical Terminology, Gastroenterology and Health Informatics, having authored 139 papers that have together received 3.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (57 papers), Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (28 papers) and Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques (15 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gastroenterology (263 citations), Oncology (1.1k citations) and Health Informatics (37 citations). Thomas de Lange has collaborated with scholars based in Norway, Germany and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include T. P. Martin, H. Göhlich, Michael A. Riegler, Pål Halvorsen, Konstantin Pogorelov, Sigrun Losada Eskeland, Carsten Griwodz, Dag Johansen, Kristin Ranheim Randel and Peter T. Schmidt. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Gastroenterology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.