Thomas D. Petes
Impact in
- Aging top 0.5%
- Molecular Biology top 0.2%
- DNA Repair Mechanisms
- Fungal and yeast genetics research
- CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
- Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
Papers in
-
- DNA Repair Mechanisms 130
- Fungal and yeast genetics research 107
- Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics 34
- CRISPR and Genetic Engineering 32
- RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms 31
- Aging 3
- Co-authors
- Margaret DominskaPatricia W. GreenwellR. Michael LiskayMicheline K. StrandTomas A. ProllaSamuel T. HendersonPiotr A. MieczkowskiSue Jinks-Robertson
- Journals
- Genetics (45 papers)Molecular and Cellular Biology (34 papers)Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (27 papers)Nature (11 papers)PLoS Genetics (9 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesChinaRussia
In The Last Decade
Thomas D. Petes
180 papers receiving 12.3k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 124
- Aging 408
- Molecular Biology 11.0k
- Genetics 2.4k
- Plant Science 3.0k
- Cancer Research 1.2k
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas D. Petes
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas D. Petes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas D. Petes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas D. Petes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas D. Petes
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas D. Petes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas D. Petes. The network helps show where Thomas D. Petes may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas D. Petes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 3 | 2023 | 14 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 17 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 28 | |
| 6 | 2012 | 17 | |
| 7 | 2012 | 22 | |
| 8 | 2010 | 44 | |
| 9 | 2008 | 188 | |
| 10 | 2007 | 89 | |
| 11 | 2002 | 56 | |
| 12 | 1998 | 165 | |
| 13 | 1992 | 67 | |
| 14 | 1992 | 11 | |
| 15 | 1991 | 3 | |
| 16 | 1991 | 71 | |
| 17 | 1989 | 4 | |
| 18 | 1988 | 98 | |
| 19 | 1988 | 22 | |
| 20 | Recombination in yeast ribosomal DNA | 1982 | 2 |
About Thomas D. Petes
Thomas D. Petes is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Aging, Cell Biology, Plant Science and Genetics, having authored 183 papers that have together received 12.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include DNA Repair Mechanisms (130 papers), Fungal and yeast genetics research (107 papers), Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (34 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (32 papers), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (31 papers), Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (27 papers), Microtubule and mitosis dynamics (21 papers) and Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (15 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Aging (408 citations), Molecular Biology (11.0k citations), Genetics (2.4k citations), Plant Science (3.0k citations) and Cancer Research (1.2k citations). Thomas D. Petes has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Margaret Dominska, Patricia W. Greenwell, R. Michael Liskay, Micheline K. Strand, Tomas A. Prolla, Samuel T. Henderson, Piotr A. Mieczkowski, Sue Jinks-Robertson, Robert J. Kokoska and Monika Wierdl. Their work appears in journals such as Genetics, Molecular and Cellular Biology, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Nature and PLoS Genetics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.