Thomas Curie

15 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Thomas Curie
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 657
  • Aging 90
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 443
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 210
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 271
Replace Yann Emmenegger with:
Yann Emmenegger Switzerland
Daniel Granados‐Fuentes United States
Alun T. L. Hughes United Kingdom
Jennifer A. Evans United States
E. Todd Weber United States
Martina Pfeffer Germany
Clare Guilding United Kingdom
Isabelle Schmutz Switzerland
Damien Colas United States
Thomas Curie relative to Yann Emmenegger Switzerland Yann Emmenegger's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Yann Emmenegger · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Curie

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Curie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Curie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Curie more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Curie

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Curie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Curie. The network helps show where Thomas Curie may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Curie, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Curie Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Curie links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 2015243
2 2010156
3 2012135
4 2013119
5 201197
6 201373
7 201372
8 201554
9 200742
10 200539
11 201530
12 200624
13 201214
14 20052
15
Utilisation du fragment C-terminal de la neurotoxine tetanique pour visualiser et analyser des connexions neuronales et pour le transfert d'une activité biologique associée. [C-terminal fragment of tetanus toxin : its use in neuronal network analysis and its potential as non-viral vector].
20051

About Thomas Curie

Thomas Curie is a scholar working on Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience, Neurology and Molecular Biology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Circadian rhythm and melatonin (7 papers), Sleep and Wakefulness Research (5 papers), Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (3 papers), Nerve injury and regeneration (2 papers), Toxin Mechanisms and Immunotoxins (2 papers), Spaceflight effects on biology (2 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (2 papers) and Light effects on plants (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (657 citations), Aging (90 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (443 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (210 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (271 citations). Thomas Curie has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Paul Franken, Valérie Mongrain, Yann Emmenegger, Stéphane Dorsaz, Sylvain Pradervand, Pascal Gos, Ueli Schibler, Pauline Gosselin, Gianpaolo Rando and Ivana Gotić. Their work appears in journals such as SLEEP, PLoS ONE, Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology, Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism and Journal of Neuroscience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact