Thomas Craven
Impact in
-
- Nosocomial Infections in ICU
-
- Adipose Tissue and Metabolism
- Diet and metabolism studies
Papers in
-
- Nosocomial Infections in ICU 5
-
- Respiratory Support and Mechanisms 4
- Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research 3
- Neonatal Respiratory Health Research 2
- Co-authors
- Kevin Dhaliwal (11 shared papers)Timothy Walsh (8 shared papers)Ahsan R. Akram (7 shared papers)Mark Bradley (8 shared papers)Emma Scholefield (6 shared papers)Neil McDonald (6 shared papers)Nicolaos Avlonitis (4 shared papers)Bethany Mills (5 shared papers)
- Journals
- Scientific Reports (3 papers)The Lancet (2 papers)Clinics in Chest Medicine (1 paper)BMC Pulmonary Medicine (1 paper)Journal of the Intensive Care Society (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomMalaysiaUnited Arab Emirates
In The Last Decade
Thomas Craven
16 papers receiving 327 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 31
- Physiology 100
- Rehabilitation 25
- Biophysics 18
- Microbiology 14
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Craven
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Craven's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Craven with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Craven more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Craven
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Craven. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Craven. The network helps show where Thomas Craven may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Craven, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 102 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 72 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 29 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 29 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 23 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 18 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 17 | |
| 8 | 1984 | 16 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 7 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 5 | |
| 11 | 2022 | 4 | |
| 12 | 2016 | 4 | |
| 13 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 14 | Ballistic and snake photon imaging for accurate location of optical endomicroscopy fibres | 2017 | 1 |
| 15 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 16 | 2019 | 1 |
About Thomas Craven
Thomas Craven is a scholar working on Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Epidemiology, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Organic Chemistry, having authored 16 papers that have together received 331 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nosocomial Infections in ICU (5 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (4 papers), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research (3 papers), Advanced Fiber Optic Sensors (2 papers), Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (2 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (1 paper), Click Chemistry and Applications (1 paper) and Muscle metabolism and nutrition (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (31 citations), Physiology (100 citations), Rehabilitation (25 citations), Biophysics (18 citations) and Microbiology (14 citations). Thomas Craven has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Malaysia and United Arab Emirates. Frequent co-authors include Kevin Dhaliwal, Timothy Walsh, Ahsan R. Akram, Mark Bradley, Emma Scholefield, Neil McDonald, Nicolaos Avlonitis, Bethany Mills, Calum Gray and Brian R. Walker. Their work appears in journals such as Scientific Reports, The Lancet, Clinics in Chest Medicine, BMC Pulmonary Medicine and Journal of the Intensive Care Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.