Thomas Cobb

520 total citations
3 papers, 186 citations indexed

About

Thomas Cobb is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Artificial Intelligence and Language and Linguistics. According to data from OpenAlex, Thomas Cobb has authored 3 papers receiving a total of 186 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 2 papers in Artificial Intelligence and 2 papers in Language and Linguistics. Recurrent topics in Thomas Cobb's work include Second Language Acquisition and Learning (3 papers), Natural Language Processing Techniques (2 papers) and Lexicography and Language Studies (2 papers). Thomas Cobb is often cited by papers focused on Second Language Acquisition and Learning (3 papers), Natural Language Processing Techniques (2 papers) and Lexicography and Language Studies (2 papers). Thomas Cobb collaborates with scholars based in Canada and Italy. Thomas Cobb's co-authors include and has published in prestigious journals such as System, Reading in a Foreign Language and Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences.

In The Last Decade

Thomas Cobb

3 papers receiving 143 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Thomas Cobb Canada	2	151	113	96	62	20	3	186
Agnieszka Leńko‐Szymańska Poland	7	177 1.2×	99 0.9×	105 1.1×	110 1.8×	15 0.8×	13	218
Angela Joe New Zealand	4	210 1.4×	177 1.6×	80 0.8×	56 0.9×	14 0.7×	6	251
Pieter de Haan Netherlands	8	61 0.4×	96 0.8×	41 0.4×	57 0.9×	15 0.8×	17	139
Angela Hasselgren Norway	4	101 0.7×	150 1.3×	34 0.4×	96 1.5×	32 1.6×	6	186
Cecilia Andorno Italy	8	26 0.2×	138 1.2×	93 1.0×	43 0.7×	6 0.3×	38	172
Makhan L. Tickoo India	7	54 0.4×	121 1.1×	35 0.4×	78 1.3×	21 1.1×	24	165
Krista Varantola Finland	8	23 0.2×	124 1.1×	93 1.0×	17 0.3×	2 0.1×	20	158
Ali Dabbagh Iran	5	44 0.3×	45 0.4×	8 0.1×	23 0.4×	34 1.7×	19	86
Yachao Sun China	11	89 0.6×	134 1.2×	49 0.5×	200 3.2×	54 2.7×	23	270
Marisa Presas Spain	7	17 0.1×	190 1.7×	64 0.7×	47 0.8×	18 0.9×	29	220

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Cobb

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Cobb's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Cobb with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Cobb more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Cobb

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Cobb. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Cobb. The network helps show where Thomas Cobb may publish in the future.

No nodes

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

3 of 3 papers shown

1.

Cobb, Thomas. (2016). Numbers or numerology? A response to Nation (2014) and McQuillan (2016). Reading in a Foreign Language. 28(2). 299–304. 9 indexed citations

2.

Cobb, Thomas. (2010). Instructional uses of linguistic technologies. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 3. 14–23. 1 indexed citations

3.

Cobb, Thomas, et al.. (2004). Can learners use concordance feedback for writing errors?. System. 32(3). 301–319. 176 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact