Thomas Clavier

64 papers receiving 501 citations

Peers

Thomas Clavier
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 43
  • Emergency Medicine 58
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 33
  • Health 43
  • Neurology 42
Replace Emmanuel Besnier with:
Emmanuel Besnier France
Vincent Compère France
Rachid Mahmoudi France
Esmaeil Fakharian Iran
Giulia Ogliari United Kingdom
Shuai Zhao China
Montserrat Martín‐Baranera Spain
Chloé E. Hill United States
Hisashi Urushihara Japan
Thomas Clavier relative to Emmanuel Besnier France Emmanuel Besnier's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.7×
Emmanuel Besnier · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Clavier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Clavier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Clavier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Clavier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Clavier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Clavier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Clavier. The network helps show where Thomas Clavier may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Clavier, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Clavier Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Clavier links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 72 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201537
2 201933
3 201730
4 202130
5 202027
6 201622
7 202021
8 201921
9 201720
10 202018
11 202117
12 202114
13 201413
14 201712
15 202011
16 201811
17 201910
18 202110
19 202010
20 20239

About Thomas Clavier

Thomas Clavier is a scholar working on Surgery, Emergency Medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, General Health Professions and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 72 papers that have together received 515 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (8 papers), Social Media in Health Education (8 papers), Health Literacy and Information Accessibility (7 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (7 papers), Anesthesia and Pain Management (7 papers), Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (6 papers), Nausea and vomiting management (6 papers) and Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (43 citations), Emergency Medicine (58 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (33 citations), Health (43 citations) and Neurology (42 citations). Thomas Clavier has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Emmanuel Besnier, Vincent Compère, Benoît Veber, Jean Selim, Hélène Castel, B. Dureuil, Vincent Compère, Fabienne Tamion, Mohamad El Amki and Zoé Demailly. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Medicine, Shock, JMIR mhealth and uhealth, BMC Anesthesiology and Cancers.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact