Chloé E. Hill

1.2k citations
55 papers · 693 indexed · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Chloé E. Hill

52 papers receiving 662 citations

Peers

Chloé E. Hill
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 339
  • Health Informatics 17
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 219
  • Neurology 97
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 95
Replace Daniel Labovitz with:
Daniel Labovitz United States
Arron Lacey United Kingdom
Katy Gallop United Kingdom
Rebecca J. Swain‐Eng United States
Patrizia Berto Italy
Chana A. Sacks United States
Viji Pulikkel Chandran India
Michael Pizzi United States
Niklas Schmedt Germany
Helmar Bornemann‐Cimenti Austria
Chloé E. Hill relative to Daniel Labovitz United States Daniel Labovitz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Daniel Labovitz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chloé E. Hill

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chloé E. Hill's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chloé E. Hill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chloé E. Hill more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chloé E. Hill

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chloé E. Hill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chloé E. Hill. The network helps show where Chloé E. Hill may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Chloé E. Hill, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chloé E. Hill Line = papers co-authored together Chloé E. Hill links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 55 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201891
2 201769
3 202056
4 202153
5 200738
6 202127
7 202124
8 201522
9 202021
10 201720
11 202019
12 202119
13 202217
14 201916
15 202314
16 202314
17 202213
18 201812
19 202011
20 199811

About Chloé E. Hill

Chloé E. Hill is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, General Health Professions, Cognitive Neuroscience and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 55 papers that have together received 693 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epilepsy research and treatment (31 papers), Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies (19 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (6 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (5 papers), Neonatal and fetal brain pathology (4 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (4 papers), Pharmaceutical studies and practices (4 papers) and Topic Modeling (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (339 citations), Health Informatics (17 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (219 citations), Neurology (97 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (95 citations). Chloé E. Hill has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Brian Litt, James Burke, Kathryn A. Davis, Samuel W. Terman, Colin A. Ellis, Chun Chieh Lin, Brian C. Callaghan, Gregory J. Esper, Nabila Dahodwala and Lesli E. Skolarus. Their work appears in journals such as Neurology, Epilepsy & Behavior, Seizure, Epilepsia and Epilepsia Open.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact