Thomas Chapman

56 papers receiving 896 citations

Peers

Thomas Chapman
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Insect Science 364
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 372
  • Genetics 194
  • Ecological Modeling 27
  • Surgery 251
Replace R. Cruickshank with:
R. Cruickshank United Kingdom
Frank Bernhard Kraus Germany
Martin Grassberger Austria
Andrea Harnos Hungary
Heli Salmela Finland
Hiroyuki Takaoka Japan
H. R. Smith United Kingdom
G. W. Wharton United States
Brian P. Bourke United States
Ibrahim Helmy Egypt
Thomas Chapman relative to R. Cruickshank United Kingdom R. Cruickshank's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
R. Cruickshank · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Chapman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Chapman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Chapman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Chapman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Chapman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Chapman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Chapman. The network helps show where Thomas Chapman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Chapman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Chapman Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Chapman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 59 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1997107
2 201599
3 202064
4 200757
5
Adaptive divergence in contiguous populations of Darwin's Small Ground Finch (Geospiza fuliginosa)
200654
6 201647
7 201931
8 199828
9 200724
10 201924
11 201224
12 201123
13 202023
14 201421
15 201521
16 199621
17 200420
18 200117
19 201817
20 201416

About Thomas Chapman

Thomas Chapman is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science, Surgery, Genetics and Epidemiology, having authored 59 papers that have together received 944 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant and animal studies (23 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (17 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (12 papers), Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques (8 papers), Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (7 papers), Bone fractures and treatments (7 papers), Plant Parasitism and Resistance (5 papers) and Insect behavior and control techniques (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (364 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (372 citations), Genetics (194 citations), Ecological Modeling (27 citations) and Surgery (251 citations). Thomas Chapman has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Bernard J. Crespi, N. Kirk Hillier, Catherine M. Little, Umraz Khan, Michael P. Schwarz, Michael McLeish, John Mathews, Thomas C. Wright, Sonia Kleindorfer and Frank J. Sulloway. Their work appears in journals such as Injury, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, Journal of Plastic Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, Journal of Insect Behavior and Journal of Insect Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact