Thomas Célarier

33 papers receiving 704 citations

Peers

Thomas Célarier
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Infectious Diseases 222
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 18
  • Health 95
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 165
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 189
Replace Saman Khalatbari‐Soltani with:
Saman Khalatbari‐Soltani Australia
Cinzia Lo Noce Italy
Zainab Shahid United States
Sathish Rajaa India
Devyani Ramgobin United States
Grant M. A. Wyper United Kingdom
James Lando United States
Kamlesh Sharma India
Nancy Woolard United States
Tanveer Rehman India
Thomas Célarier relative to Saman Khalatbari‐Soltani Australia Saman Khalatbari‐Soltani's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.6×
Saman Khalatbari‐Soltani · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Célarier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Célarier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Célarier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Célarier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Célarier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Célarier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Célarier. The network helps show where Thomas Célarier may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Célarier, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Célarier Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Célarier links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020246
2 2020167
3 202261
4 202051
5 201637
6 202130
7 202322
8 202121
9 202114
10 20229
11 20208
12 20228
13 20227
14 20205
15 20205
16 20184
17 20213
18 20203
19 20093
20 20223

About Thomas Célarier

Thomas Célarier is a scholar working on Geriatrics and Gerontology, Internal Medicine, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Neurology and Rehabilitation, having authored 42 papers that have together received 729 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Long-Term Effects of COVID-19 (6 papers), Health, Medicine and Society (6 papers), Frailty in Older Adults (6 papers), Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (5 papers), Chronic Disease Management Strategies (5 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (4 papers), COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies (4 papers) and Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Infectious Diseases (222 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (18 citations), Health (95 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (165 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (189 citations). Thomas Célarier has collaborated with scholars based in France, Canada and United Arab Emirates. Frequent co-authors include Luc Goethals, Bienvenu Bongué, Nathalie Barth, David Hupin, Jessica Guyot, Cédric Annweiler, Ludovic Lafaie, Jean‐Marc Sabatier, Jennifer Gautier and Sylvain Grange. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Public Health, The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, BMC Geriatrics, PLoS Medicine and European Journal of Public Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026