Thomas Broman
Impact in
-
- History of Science and Natural History
- Historical Philosophy and Science
- Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
- History of Science and Medicine
Papers in
-
- History of Science and Natural History 2
- Philosophy, Science, and History 2
- Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis 2
- History of Science and Medicine 2
- History 6
- Medical History and Research 3
- Medical History and Innovations 2
- Co-authors
- David Lindenfeld (1 shared paper)Lynn K. Nyhart (1 shared paper)Lisa Rosner (1 shared paper)Thomas Neville Bonner (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Osiris (3 papers)The American Historical Review (2 papers)History of Science (2 papers)The Journal of Interdisciplinary History (1 paper)The Journal of Modern History (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Thomas Broman
14 papers receiving 142 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
- History and Philosophy of Science 64
- General Psychology 8
- Anthropology 50
- History 48
- Literature and Literary Theory 22
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Broman
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Broman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Broman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Broman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Broman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Broman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Broman. The network helps show where Thomas Broman may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 4 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Broman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2002 | 73 | |
| 2 | 1998 | 27 | |
| 3 | 1995 | 23 | |
| 4 | 1996 | 21 | |
| 5 | 1998 | 13 | |
| 6 | 2002 | 11 | |
| 7 | 1989 | 9 | |
| 8 | Science and civil society | 2002 | 7 |
| 9 | 1994 | 7 | |
| 10 | 2012 | 6 | |
| 11 | 2012 | 5 | |
| 12 | 2013 | 4 | |
| 13 | 1998 | 3 | |
| 14 | 2015 | 2 | |
| 15 | 2010 | 1 | |
| 16 | 2019 | 0 |
About Thomas Broman
Thomas Broman is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, History, Anthropology, Political Science and International Relations and Clinical Psychology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 212 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical and Literary Studies (4 papers), Medical History and Research (3 papers), History of Science and Natural History (2 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (2 papers), Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (2 papers), Medical History and Innovations (2 papers), History of Science and Medicine (2 papers) and Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (64 citations), General Psychology (8 citations), Anthropology (50 citations), History (48 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (22 citations). Thomas Broman has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include David Lindenfeld, Lynn K. Nyhart, Lisa Rosner and Thomas Neville Bonner. Their work appears in journals such as Osiris, The American Historical Review, History of Science, The Journal of Interdisciplinary History and The Journal of Modern History.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.