Thomas Amatruda

7.9k total citations
66 papers, 3.8k citations indexed

About

Thomas Amatruda is a scholar working on Oncology, Molecular Biology and Genetics. According to data from OpenAlex, Thomas Amatruda has authored 66 papers receiving a total of 3.8k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 38 papers in Oncology, 19 papers in Molecular Biology and 19 papers in Genetics. Recurrent topics in Thomas Amatruda's work include CAR-T cell therapy research (29 papers), Virus-based gene therapy research (16 papers) and Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management (14 papers). Thomas Amatruda is often cited by papers focused on CAR-T cell therapy research (29 papers), Virus-based gene therapy research (16 papers) and Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management (14 papers). Thomas Amatruda collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Thomas Amatruda's co-authors include Melvin I. Simon, G. Virginia Upton, M I Simon, Howard L. Kaufman, René González, Vladlen Z. Slepak, David A. Steele, Neil Senzer, John Nemunaitis and Henry Fong and has published in prestigious journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Journal of Biological Chemistry.

In The Last Decade

Thomas Amatruda

66 papers receiving 3.6k citations

Peers

Thomas Amatruda
Comparison fields: 5 of 115
  • Molecular Biology 1.7k
  • Oncology 1.6k
  • Genetics 960
  • Immunology 943
  • Epidemiology 337
Replace Li‐Yuan Yu‐Lee with:
Li‐Yuan Yu‐Lee United States
Hoa Nguyen United States
Carol D. Laherty United States
Paul Krimpenfort Netherlands
Toshihiko Tsukada Japan
Bjørn Steen Skålhegg Norway
Frieder Schwenk Germany
Jorge Laborda Spain
Brian Harding United Kingdom
Michael A. Patton United Kingdom
Li‐Yuan Yu‐Lee United States View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Thomas Amatruda
Thomas Amatruda · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Thomas Amatruda
Thomas Amatruda · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Amatruda

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Amatruda's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Amatruda with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Amatruda more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Amatruda

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Amatruda. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Amatruda. The network helps show where Thomas Amatruda may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas Amatruda

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas Amatruda. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas Amatruda based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas Amatruda. Thomas Amatruda is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 3
2 47
3 58
4 240
5 18
6 36
7 60
8 64
9 2
10 79
11 52
12 99
13 5
14 7
15 1
16 173
17 210
18 61
19
Battered women: a concern for the medical profession.
5
20
Induction of macrophage differentiation of human normal and leukemic myeloid stem cells by 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 and its fluorinated analogues.
193

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026