Thoại D. Ngô
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health top 1%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 2%
- General Health Professions top 2%
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 2%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Caroline FreeMin Hae ParkChris SmithJudy GoldJessie PinchoffHaleema Shakur‐StillKaren AustrianColin Sumpter
- Topics
- Global Maternal and Child Health (30 papers)Reproductive Health and Contraception (28 papers)Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (23 papers)
- Cited by
- Obstetrics and GynecologyPediatrics, Perinatology and Child HealthGeneral Health Professions
- Journals
- The LancetSHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONE
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomKenya
In The Last Decade
Thoại D. Ngô
78 papers receiving 1.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 699
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 625
- General Health Professions 587
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 339
- Clinical Psychology 197
Countries citing papers authored by Thoại D. Ngô
This map shows the geographic impact of Thoại D. Ngô's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thoại D. Ngô with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thoại D. Ngô more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thoại D. Ngô
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thoại D. Ngô. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thoại D. Ngô. The network helps show where Thoại D. Ngô may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thoại D. Ngô
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thoại D. Ngô. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thoại D. Ngô based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thoại D. Ngô. Thoại D. Ngô is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | 22 | |
| 10 | 64 | |
| 11 | 41 | |
| 12 | 27 | |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | 6 | |
| 15 | 5 | |
| 16 | 9 | |
| 17 | 29 | |
| 18 | 8 | |
| 19 | 5 | |
| 20 | 16 |
About Thoại D. Ngô
Thoại D. Ngô is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Modeling and Simulation, having authored 87 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global Maternal and Child Health (30 papers), Reproductive Health and Contraception (28 papers) and Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (23 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (339 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (699 citations) and General Health Professions (587 citations). Thoại D. Ngô has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Kenya. Frequent co-authors include Caroline Free, Min Hae Park, Chris Smith, Judy Gold, Jessie Pinchoff, Haleema Shakur‐Still, Karen Austrian, Colin Sumpter, Eva Muluve and Beth Kangwana. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.