Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The Three Faces of Securitization: Political Agency, Audience and Context
2005642 citationsThierry BalzacqEuropean Journal of International Relationsprofile →
‘Securitization’ revisited: theory and cases
2015234 citationsThierry Balzacq, Sarah Léonard et al.International Relationsprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Thierry Balzacq
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Thierry Balzacq's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thierry Balzacq with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thierry Balzacq more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thierry Balzacq. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thierry Balzacq. The network helps show where Thierry Balzacq may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thierry Balzacq
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thierry Balzacq.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thierry Balzacq based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Thierry Balzacq. Thierry Balzacq is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Balzacq, Thierry, Jérémie Cornut, & Frédéric Ramel. (2017). Global International Relations as Alternative to the American Mainstream: The Case of International Relations in France. Critique internationale. 69–93.1 indexed citations
8.
Baele, Stéphane J., Thierry Balzacq, & Philippe Bourbeau. (2017). Numbers in global security governance. European Journal of International Security. 3(1). 22–44.11 indexed citations
Balzacq, Thierry, Sarah Léonard, & Jan Ruzicka. (2015). ‘Securitization’ revisited: theory and cases. International Relations. 30(4). 494–531.234 indexed citations breakdown →
14.
Balzacq, Thierry. (2008). The External Dimension of EU Justice and Home Affairs: Tools, Processes, Outcomes. CEPS Working Document No. 303, September 2008. Archive of European Integration (AEI) (University of Pittsburgh).5 indexed citations
15.
Guild, Elspeth, Sergio Carrera, & Thierry Balzacq. (2008). The changing dynamics of security in an enlarged European Union. Challenge Paper No. 12, 24 October 2008. Archive of European Integration (AEI) (University of Pittsburgh).3 indexed citations
Balzacq, Thierry & Sergio Carrera. (2005). Migration, Borders and Asylum - Trends and Vulnerabilities in EU Policy. CEPS Paperback. July 2005. Archive of European Integration (AEI) (University of Pittsburgh).8 indexed citations
18.
Balzacq, Thierry. (2005). The Three Faces of Securitization: Political Agency, Audience and Context. European Journal of International Relations. 11(2). 171–201.642 indexed citations breakdown →
19.
Balzacq, Thierry. (2003). What Is National Security. 33–50.8 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.