Thérèse Jones
About
In The Last Decade
Thérèse Jones
6 papers receiving 475 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
- Cognitive Neuroscience 175
- Nutrition and Dietetics 159
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 132
- Social Psychology 117
- General Health Professions 83
Countries citing papers authored by Thérèse Jones
This map shows the geographic impact of Thérèse Jones's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thérèse Jones with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thérèse Jones more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thérèse Jones
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thérèse Jones. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thérèse Jones. The network helps show where Thérèse Jones may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thérèse Jones
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thérèse Jones. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thérèse Jones based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thérèse Jones. Thérèse Jones is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 131 | |
| 3 | 92 | |
| 4 | 243 | |
| 5 | 32 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 1 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.