Theodor Geiger
Impact in
Papers in
-
- Historical Legal Studies and Society 1
- European history and politics 1
-
- Urbanization and City Planning 2
- Co-authors
- Ernest Manheim (1 shared paper)Albert Guérard (1 shared paper)Renate Mayntz (1 shared paper)Esteban Medina (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Social Forces (1 paper)American Sociological Review (1 paper)Medical Entomology and Zoology (1 paper)Duncker & Humblot eBooks (2 papers)Revista española de la opinión pública (2 papers)
In The Last Decade
Theodor Geiger
12 papers receiving 144 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
- Life-span and Life-course Studies 3
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 4
- Public Administration 8
- Sociology and Political Science 92
- Law 17
Countries citing papers authored by Theodor Geiger
This map shows the geographic impact of Theodor Geiger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Theodor Geiger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Theodor Geiger more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Theodor Geiger
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Theodor Geiger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Theodor Geiger. The network helps show where Theodor Geiger may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 4 scholars most cited alongside Theodor Geiger, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1952 | 81 | |
| 2 | Die soziale Schichtung des deutschen Volkes : soziographischer Versuch auf statistischer Grundlage | 1967 | 32 |
| 3 | 1987 | 18 | |
| 4 | Die Klassengesellschaft im Schmelztiegel | 1975 | 16 |
| 5 | 1970 | 10 | |
| 6 | 1951 | 5 | |
| 7 | Ideologie und Wahrheit : eine soziologische Kritik des Denkens | 1953 | 4 |
| 8 | 1973 | 4 | |
| 9 | Estudios preliminares de sociología del derecho | 2001 | 2 |
| 10 | Soziale Umschichtungen in einer dänischen Mittelstadt | 1951 | 2 |
| 11 | Erwachsenenbildung aus Distanz und Verpflichtung | 1984 | 1 |
| 12 | 1972 | 1 | |
| 13 | 1979 | 1 |
About Theodor Geiger
Theodor Geiger is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Urban Studies, Sociology and Political Science, Law and Safety Research, having authored 13 papers that have together received 177 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Urbanization and City Planning (2 papers), Criminal Law and Policy (1 paper), Legal processes and jurisprudence (1 paper), Historical Legal Studies and Society (1 paper), Education Methods and Technologies (1 paper), European history and politics (1 paper), Employment, Labor, and Gender Studies (1 paper) and Social Sciences and Policies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Life-span and Life-course Studies (3 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (4 citations), Public Administration (8 citations), Sociology and Political Science (92 citations) and Law (17 citations). Frequent co-authors include Ernest Manheim, Albert Guérard, Renate Mayntz and Esteban Medina. Their work appears in journals such as Social Forces, American Sociological Review, Medical Entomology and Zoology, Duncker & Humblot eBooks and Revista española de la opinión pública.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.