Thein Win

516 citations
8 papers · 344 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Thein Win

8 papers receiving 336 citations

Peers

Thein Win
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 97
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 139
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 5
  • General Health Professions 57
  • Parasitology 14
Replace Katherine Winter with:
Katherine Winter United States
Latifa Adarmouch Morocco
Andargie Abate Ethiopia
Daniela González Chile
Alison Tonks New Zealand
Catherine L. Streeton Australia
Abubakar Mohammed Jibo Nigeria
Lyndsey S. Benson United States
Salwa Bahkali Saudi Arabia
Lauren Evans United States
Thein Win relative to Katherine Winter United States Katherine Winter's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Katherine Winter · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thein Win

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thein Win's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thein Win with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thein Win more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thein Win

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thein Win. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thein Win. The network helps show where Thein Win may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Thein Win, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thein Win Line = papers co-authored together Thein Win links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1 2010139
2 199879
3 199855
4 200739
5 200821
6 20189
7 20191
8
An assessment of the 'road-to-health-booklet' based on knowledge/perceptions of the clinic nurses and conduct a record review of the completion of the booklets
20161

About Thein Win

Thein Win is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 8 papers that have together received 344 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (2 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (2 papers), Malaria Research and Control (1 paper), Sex work and related issues (1 paper), Psychiatric care and mental health services (1 paper), Clinical practice guidelines implementation (1 paper), Mosquito-borne diseases and control (1 paper) and Herpesvirus Infections and Treatments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (97 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (139 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (5 citations), General Health Professions (57 citations) and Parasitology (14 citations). Thein Win has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Thailand and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Esme Moniz‐Cook, Sharon Agar, Miriam Silver, Frank Smithuis, Moe Kyaw Kyaw, Sue J. Lee, Elizabeth A. Ashley, Nicholas J. White, Mallika Imwong and Bob Woods. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, Aging & Mental Health, Globalization and Health and The Lancet Infectious Diseases.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact