Th. Skolem

948 citations
18 papers · 279 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Th. Skolem

15 papers receiving 210 citations

Peers

Th. Skolem
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 50
  • Theoretical Computer Science 9
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 118
  • Geometry and Topology 41
  • Algebra and Number Theory 21
Replace Thomas Storer with:
Thomas Storer United States
L. M. Kelly United States
Bryant Tuckerman United States
David Singmaster United Kingdom
J. Koch United States
Charles Vanden Eynden United States
Frank R. Bernhart United States
Chris Freiling United States
Daniel A. Marcus United States
Saul Stahl United States
Th. Skolem relative to Thomas Storer United States Thomas Storer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Thomas Storer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Th. Skolem

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Th. Skolem's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Th. Skolem with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Th. Skolem more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Th. Skolem

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Th. Skolem. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Th. Skolem. The network helps show where Th. Skolem may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 3 scholars most cited alongside Th. Skolem, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Th. Skolem Line = papers co-authored together Th. Skolem links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 1957129
2 195854
3 196017
4 196315
5 195712
6 195111
7 19598
8
Abstract set theory
19628
9 19556
10 19514
11
Consideraciones sobre los fundamentos de la matemática
19523
12 19603
13 19532
14 19612
15 19582
16 19581
17 19551
18 19571

About Th. Skolem

Th. Skolem is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Geometry and Topology, Artificial Intelligence, Mathematical Physics and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 18 papers that have together received 279 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Algebra and Logic (4 papers), Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory (1 paper), Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms (1 paper), Mathematics and Applications (1 paper), Diverse Historical and Scientific Studies (1 paper), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (1 paper), Coding theory and cryptography (1 paper) and Advanced Mathematical Theories and Applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (50 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (9 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (118 citations), Geometry and Topology (41 citations) and Algebra and Number Theory (21 citations). Th. Skolem has collaborated with scholars based in Norway. Frequent co-authors include D. J. Lewis, S. Chowla and Andrzej Mostowski. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Symbolic Logic, Synthese, dialectica, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society and Mathematische Zeitschrift.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact